This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Bibliography
Amano, Hirofusa (1964), ‘Haribhadra no busshinron’ (The Buddhakāya Theory of Haribhadra),ShŪkyŌ KenkyŪ (= ShK: Journal of Religious Studies), Vol. 37-4 (No. 179), Tokyo, pp. 27–57.
Amano, Hirofusa (1975), (ed.)A Study on the Abhisamaya-ala295-01kāra-kārikā-Śāstrav295-02tti, Tokyo.
Amano, Hirofusa (1983), ‘GenkanshŌgon-shaku no Bonbun shahon (1)’ (The Sanskrit Manuscript of the Abhisamayāla\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \)kāra Commentary),Hijisan Tanki Daigaku KiyŌ, Vol. 17, pp. 1–15.
Isoda, Hirofumi (1985), ‘ “Abhisamayāla296-02kāra” no sanshinsetsu to shishinsetsu’ (The Threefold Body System and the Fourfold Body System of theAbhisamayālamkāra),Indogaku BukkyŌgaku KenkyŪ (= JIBS: Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies), 34-1 (Vol. 67), Tokyo, pp. 368–375.
Isoda, Hirofumi (1991a), ‘“KĪrtikalā” ni tsuite’ (On theKĪrtikalā), JIBS, 39-2 (Vol. 78), pp. 1–11.
Isoda, Hirofumi (1991b), ‘RatnākaraŚānti, “ŚuddhamatĪ” dainisho’ (On the Chapter II of RatnākaraŚānti's Śuddhamati). Festschrift for Prof. Dr. S. Ihara on his 70th Birthday, Kita-KyŪshŪ, pp. 69–88.
Kendai, En'Ō (1973), (ed.)Abhisamayāla \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) kāra-Śāstra-\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t} \) Īkā no KenkyŪ, Osaka.
Makransky, John J. (1989), ‘Controversy over Dharmakāya in India and Tibet: A Reappraisal of Its Basis, Abhisamayāla\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \)kāra Chapter 8’,The Journal of the Inter-national Association of Buddhist Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2, Madison, pp. 45–78.
Makransky, John J. (1990), ‘Controversy over Dharmakāya in Indo-Tibetan Buddhism: An Historical-critical Analysis of Abhisamayāla\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \)kāra Chapter 8 and Its Commentaries in Relation to the Large Prajñāpāramitā SŪtra and the Yogācāra Tradition’, University Microfilms International. (Doctoral dissertation presented to the University of Wisconsin-Madison.)
Makransky, John J. (1992), ‘Proposal of a Modern Solution to an Ancient Problem: Literary-Historical Evidence that theAbhisamayāla \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) kāra Teaches Three Buddha Kāyas’,Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 149–190.
Mimaki, Katsumi (1985), ‘Setsunametsu ronshŌ’ (K\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)a\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)abhanga Theory),KŌza DaijŌ BukkyŌ, Vol. 9:Ninshikiron to Ronrigaku, Tokyo, pp. 217–254.
Mimaki, Katsumi: (1992), ‘The Intellectual Sequence of RatnākaraŚānti, JñānaŚrĪmitra and RatnakĪrti’,Asiatische Studien études Asiatiques, XLVI.1, pp. 297–306.
Obermiller, E. (1933), ‘The Doctrine of Prajñāpāramitā as Exposed in the Abhisamayāla296-10kāra of Maitreya’,Acta Orientalia, Vol. XI Lugduni Batavorum, pp. 1–133 and pp. 334–354.
Obermiller, E. (1937), (ed.)Prajñā Pāramitā-ratna-gu \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)a-sa\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) caya-gāthā, Sanscrit and Tibetan Text, Biblio. Buddhica XXIX.
Sakuma, Hidenori-ShŪhan (1986), ‘ “Genkanshogonron” Hosshin-shŌ o megutte (1) -Go ram pa “Genkanshogonron-shaku” daihasshŌ -’ (Go rom pa'sAbhisamayā- la296-13kāra Commentary, Chapter VIII: Introduction and Translation),Chibetto no BukkyŌ to Shakai, ed. by Z. Yamaguchi, Tokyo, pp. 291–319.
Sakuma, Hidenori-ShŪhan (1987), ‘〈Sanshin〉 to 〈Goho〉 — ryosha no ketsugo kankei to sono seiritsu katei’ (Three Kāyas and Five Elements: Their Interconnection and Its Development), Festschrift for Prof. Dr. J. Takasaki in his 60th Birthday:Indogaku BukkyŌgaku RonshŪ, Tokyo, pp. 387–411.
Sakuma, Hidenori-ShŪhan (1989), ‘Hsüan-tsang ni okeru 〈busshin〉 no atsukaikata’ (Some Aspects of Hsüan-tsang's Treatment of Buddhakāya Theory),BukkyŌ Bunka, 22 (Vol. 25), Tokyo, pp. 94–108.
Sakuma, Hidenori-ShŪhan (1992a), ‘“Genkanshogonron” daihasshŌ o meguru Indo shochŪshakuka no bunrui — sanshinsetsu to shishinsetsu’ (The Classification of Indian Commentators on the Dharmakāya Chapter of the Abhisamayāla{296-17}kāra; The Threefold and the Fourfold Buddhakāya Theory),ShitennŌji Kokusai BukkyŌ Daigaku Kiyo, No. 24, Osaka, pp. 1–30.
Sakuma, Hidenori-ShŪhan (1992b), ‘ “GenkanshŌgonron” o meguru sanshinsetsu gurŪpu ni yoru daiisshŌ daijŪnanage kaihen no keii’ (The Process of Modifications of Verse 17 in Chapter 1 of theAbhisamayāla \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) kāra), Festschrift for Prof. Dr. R. Mano, Tokyo, pp. 183–194.
Seyfort-Ruegg, David (1981),The Literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India, Wiesbaden.
Additional information
This paper is based on my two papers in Japanese published in 1992 (Sakuma, 1992a & Sakuma, 1992b). Since then I have exchanged information on this theme with Prof. John J. Makransky and also obtained a copy of his unpublished doctoral dissertation (University Microfilms International). I have learned much from him and shall have to revise my articles. I am grateful to him and also wish to thank my colleague Rolf Giebel for correcting my poor English.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sakuma, H.S. The classification of the Dharmakāya chapter of the Abhisamayāla\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \)kāra by Indian commentators: The threefold and the fourfold Buddhakāya theories. J Indian Philos 22, 259–297 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01592346
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01592346