Abstract
CP violation can be studied in modes of charmed or bottom baryons when a decay process is compared with its charge-conjugated partner. It can show up as a rate asymmetry and in a study of other decay parameters. Neither tagging nor time-dependences are required to observeCP violation with modes of baryons, in contrast to the conventionalB 0 modes. Numerous modes of bottom baryons have the potential to show largeCP-violating effects within the Standard Model. Those effects can be substantial for modes with aD 0, which is seen in a final state that can also be fed from a\(\bar D^0 \). For instance, a comparison of theΛ b→Λ 0CP with the\(\bar \Lambda _b \to \bar \Lambda D_{CP}^0 \) process can show sizeableCP violation. HereD oCP denotesCP eigenstates ofD 0, which occur at a few percent. Six related processes, such asΛ b→ΛD 0,\(\Lambda _b \to \Lambda \bar D^0 \),Λ b→Λ 0CP , and their charge-conjugated counterparts, can extract ϕ, which is the most problematic angle of the unitarity triangle and which is conventionally probed with theB s→ρ0 K S asymmetry. HereD 0 andD −0 are identified by their charged kaon or lepton. We predictB(Λ b→ΛD 0)∼10−5, thusB(Λ b→Λ 0CP )∼10−7. Under favourable circumstances,CP violation can occur at the few tens of percent level. Thus 102–103 Λ b→Λ 0CP decays start probing ϕ. Tables list many additional modes with typical branching ratios at the 10−5–10−6 level, with large detection efficiencies (in contrast to theD 0CP ), and with potentially largeCP-violating effects, such as Ξ 0b →ΛΨ, Λϕ, ΛK*0; Ξ −b →ΛK(*)−, Ξ−Ks, Ξ−K*0, Ω −b →Ξ−φ, Ξ−ρ0, ΛK(*)−, ΩKs, Ω−K*0.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.H. Christenson, J.W. Cronin, V.L. Fitch, R. Turlay: Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 138
I.I. Bigi, V.A. Khoze, N.G. Uraltsev, A.I. Sanda: in:CP violation, p. 175. C. Jarlskog (ed.). Singapore: World Scientific 1989
J.D. Bjorken: Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 11 (1989) 325; I.I. Bigi, B. Stech: in Proceedings of the Workshop on High Sensitivity Beauty Physics at Fermilab, Batavia, IL, 1987, p. 239. A.J. Slaughter, N. Lockyer, M. Schmidt (eds.)
T.D. Lee, C.N. Yang: Phys. Rev. 108 (1957) 1645
J.W. Cronin, O.E. Overseth: Phys. Rev. 129 (1963) 1795
W. Koch: in: Analysis of scattering and decay, p. 231. M. Nikolic (ed.). New York, London, Paris: Gordon and Breach 1968
T.D. Lee: in: Preludes in theoretical physics, p. 5. A. De-Shalit, H. Feshbach, L. Van Hove (eds.). Amsterdam: North-Holland 1966
O.E. Overseth, and S. Pakvasa: Phys. Rev. 184 (1969) 1663.CP-violating effects with strange hyperons have been the subject of many later investigations; see for instance: A. Baltas et al.: Nuovo Cimento 45A (1978) 493; L.-L. Chau, H.-Y. Cheng: Phys. Lett. 131B (1983) 202; T. Brown, S.F. Tuan, S. Pakvasa: Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1823; J.F. Donoghue, S. Pakvasa: Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 162; J.F. Donoghue, B.R. Holstein, G. Valencia: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A2 (1987) 319; Phys. Lett. 178B (1986) 319; J.F. Donoghue, X.G. He, S. Pakvasa: Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 833; G. Bassompierre: Nuovo Cimento 101A (1989) 307; X.G. He, H. Steger, G. Valencia: Phys. Lett. B272 (1991) 411; N. Hamann et al.: Hyperon study working group Report, CERN/SPSLC report, in progress
M. Bander, D. Silverman, A. Soni: Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 242
H. Simma, G. Eilam, D. Wyler: Nucl. Phys. B352 (1991) 367
J.-M. Gérard, W.S. Hou: Phys. Lett. B253 (1991) 478; Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 2909
H. Simma, D. Wyler: Phys. Lett. B272 (1991) 395
M. Kobayashi, T. Maskawa: Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 652
M. Gronau, D. London: Phys. Lett. B253 (1991) 483
M. Gronau, D. Wyler: Phys. Lett. B265 (1991) 172
I. Dunietz: Phys. Lett. B270 (1991) 75
I. Dunietz: in: B Decays, p. 393. S. Stone (ed.). Singapore: World Scientific 1992
I. Dunietz, A. Snyder: Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 1593; see especially the longer version, SLAC report, SLAC-PUB-5234, 1990 (unpublished)
I. Dunietz, H. Quinn, A. Snyder, W. Toki and H.J. Lipkin: Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 2193
J.M. Soares: Nucl. Phys. B367 (1991) 575
R. Aleksan, I. Dunietz, B. Kayser: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 54 (1992) 653
R. Aleksan, I. Dunietz, B. Kayser, F. Le Diberder: Nucl. Phys. B361 (1991) 141
A.B. Carter, A.I. Sanda: Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 952; Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 1567; L. Wolfenstein: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 36 (1986) 137; I.I. Bigi, A.I. Sanda: Phys. Lett. B211 (1988) 213
E.D. Commins, P.H. Bucksbaum: Weak interactions of leptons and quarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983; W. Koch: [6]; G. Källén: Elementary particle physics. Reading: Addison-Wesley 1964
The example of 143-1 as a way to measure the decay parameters is reviewed here. The decay parameters α, β, γ for the 143-2 process can be extracted from the angular distribution of the subsequent 143-3 decay, as follows: 143-4, 143-5, 143-6. 143-7. Here 143-8 and 143-9 denote the 143-10 polarization and the known decay parameter for 143-11, respectively. In the definition of the angles 143-12 is the emission direction ofp in the Λ rest frame, and the 143-13 are defined in the 143-14 rest frame as 143-15, 143-16, 143-17. The emission direction of Λ in the 143-18 rest frame is denoted by Â. The azimuthal dependence has been integrated out in the intensities 143-19. From 143-20 and the known 143-21, the decay parameter α can be extracted. The initial polarization can be measured from modes with much larger data samples than the very rare exclusive modes of interest in this work, which have potentially largeCP-violating effects. Thus, β and γ can be obtained from the measured intensities 143-22 and 143-23. Although this footnote uses a nonrelativistic framework, the relations remain true for particles in relativistic motion when an elaborate procedure of boosts is applied, see W. Koch: [6]
For a review see: J. Lach: Fermilab report, 1991, FERMILAB-Conf-91/200
A. De Rujula et al.: in: Proc. of LHC Workshop (Aachen 1990), Vol. II, p. 201. G. Jarlskog, D. Rein (eds.). CERN 90-10
M. Jacob, G.C. Wick: Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 7 (1959) 404; W. Koch: [6]
J. Seguinot, T. Ypsilantis: CERN report, 1991, CERN-LAA/PI/91-004
C.O. Dib, I. Dunietz, F.J. Gilman, Y. Nir: Phys. Rev. D41 (1990) 1522
J.L. Rosner: in: B Decays, p. 312. S. Stone (ed.). Singapore: World Scientific 1992; M. Schmidtler, K.R. Schubert: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 53 (1992) 347
New physics could introduceCP-violating effects between Λb→ΛD0 and its charge-conjugated counterpart, and between\(\Lambda _b \to \Lambda \bar D^0 \) and its counterpart. We thank L. Lavoura for pointing this out to us
The unlikely scenario requires equality between the Λb→ΛD0 and\(\Lambda _b \to \Lambda \bar D^0 \) rates. It would cause a much suppressed rate in either Λb→ΛD 0CP or\(\bar \Lambda _b \to \bar \Lambda D_{CP}^0 \), which would show up as a largeCP-violating rate asymmetry. Finally, no suppression in rate would occur when theD 0 is seen in modes with the oppositeCP-parity
The non-factorizable graphs are absent in the 6 relevant processes of Ξ −b →Ξ−D0 and Ω −b →Ω−D0, because no valenceu-quark exists in the initialb-flavoured baryon
For a definition of colour-allowed and colour-suppressed processes see, for instance: M. Bauer, B. Stech, M. Wirbel: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 34 (1987) 103
A. Yagil: talk presented at La Thuile, 1992
C. Albajar et al.: Phys. Lett. B273 (1991) 540
M. Neubert et al.: Heidelberg report, HD-THEP-91-28, 1991, to be published in Heavy Flavours, A.J. Buras, M. Lindner (eds.)
J.L. Rosner: Phys. Rev. D42 (1990) 3732; Enrico Fermi Institute report, EFI 90-80, 1990, presented at Snowmass 90
T. Mannel, W. Roberts, Z. Ryzak: Nucl. Phys. B355 (1991) 38; Phys. Lett. B255 (1991) 593
N. Isgur, M.B. Wise: Nucl. Phys. B348 (1991) 278; H. Georgi: Nucl. Phys. B348 (1991) 293
Particle Data Group, J.J. Hernández et al.: Phys. Lett. B239 (1990) 1
D. Izatt et al.: Nucl. Phys. B199 (1982) 269
The leptonic width is given by\(\Gamma _{ee} = \frac{{4\pi }}{3}\left( {\frac{4}{9}} \right)\frac{{\alpha ^2 }}{{m_\psi }}f_\psi ^2 \), where the electromagnetic fine structure constant is α≈1/137
M. Danilov: review talk of heavy flavour physics (non-LEP) given at the Joint International Lepton-Photon Symposium & Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 1991
L. Wolfenstein: Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 151
M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov: Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 2583; S. Bertolini, F. Borzumati, A. Masiero: Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 180; N.G. Deshpande et al.: Phys Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 183; B. Grinstein, R. Springer, M.B. Wise: Nucl. Phys. B339 (1990) 269; A. Ali, C. Greub: Phys. Lett. B259 (1991) 182; Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields 49 (1991) 431
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dunietz, I. CP violation with beautiful baryons. Z. Phys. C - Particles and Fields 56, 129–143 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589716
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589716