Skip to main content
Log in

Enumeration of cellulolytic anaerobic bacteria from the bovine rumen: Comparison of three methods

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three methods—the most probable number technique, a cellulose agar overlay on basal carbohydrate plates, and carboxymethylcellulose in basal carbohydrate plates—were compared for ease of preparation, interpretation of results, and agreement in estimation of size of the cellulolytic bacterial population in digesta samples from the rumen. The most probable number method yielded consistent detection of cellulose hydrolysis in liquid medium but required at least a 10-day incubation, and its mean was associated with wide 95% confidence intervals. The cellulose overlay method was the least consistent, and zones of hydrolysis often were difficult to see. The carboxymethylcellulose method was the easiest method for preparation and required only a 2-day incubation. The three methods estimated the same population size (all within one-half log unit of each other), but the carboxymethylcellulose method had the lowest coefficient of variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Balch WE, Fox GE, Magrum LJ, Woese CR, Wolfe RS (1979) Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Rev 43:260–296

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bryant MP (1972) Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr 25:1324–1329

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bryant MP, Burkey LA (1953) Cultural methods and some characteristics of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. J Dairy Sci 36:205–217

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke KR, Owens NJP (1983) A simple and versatile microcomputer program for the determination of “most probable number”. J Microbiol Methods 1:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cochran WG (1950) Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the “Most Probable Number.” Biometrics 6:105–116

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hungate RE (1950) The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 14:1–49

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hungate RE (1966) The rumen and Its microbes. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leedle JAZ, Bryant MP, Hespell RB (1982) Diurnal variations in bacterial numbers and fluid parameters in ruminal contents of animals fed low-and high-forage diets. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:402–412

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leedle JAZ, Hespell RB (1980) Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating technques in delineating carbohydrate-utilizing subgroups in rumen bacterial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 39:709–719

    Google Scholar 

  10. SAS (1982) SAS user's guide: basics. Cary NC: Statistica Analysis System Institute

    Google Scholar 

  11. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods. Ames IA: Iowa State University Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Teather RM, Wood PJ (1982) Use of Congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:777–780

    Google Scholar 

  13. VanGylswk NO, Schwartz HM (1984) Microbial ecology and cellulose and hemicellulose metabolism in gastrointestinal ecosystems. In: Klug MJ, Reddy CA (eds) Current perspectives in microbial ecology: proceedings of the third international symposium on microbial ecology. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology, pp 588–599

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leedle, J.A.Z., Butine, T.J. Enumeration of cellulolytic anaerobic bacteria from the bovine rumen: Comparison of three methods. Current Microbiology 15, 77–79 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589365

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589365

Keywords

Navigation