Skip to main content
Log in

An equivalence between two algorithms for quadratic programming

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate that the Van de Panne—Whinston symmetric simplex method when applied to a certain implicit formulation of a quadratic program generates the same sequence of primal feasible vectors as does the Von Hohenbalken simplicial decomposition algorithm specialized to the same program. Such an equivalence of the two algorithms extends earlier results for a least-distance program due to Cottle—Djang.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.W. Cottle and A. Djang, “Algorithmic equivalence in quadratic programming I: A leastdistance programming problem”, Report No. 76-26, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University (Oct. 1976).

  2. R.W. Cottle and A. Djang, “Algorithmic equivalence in quadratic programming I: A leastdistance programming problem”,Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 28 (1979) 275–301.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.E. Gill, G.H. Golub, W. Murray and M.A. Saunders, “Methods for modifying matrix factorizations”,Mathematics of Computation 28 (1974) 505–535.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.S. Pang, “A column generation technique for the computation of stationary points”, MSRR 447, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie-Mellon University (Oct. 1979).

  5. A. Rudd and B. Rosenberg, “Realistic portfolio optimization”,Studies in Management Sciences 11 (1979) 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.S. Sacher, “A decomposition algorithm for quadratic programming”,Mathematical Programming 18 (1980) 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. van de Panne and A. Whinston, “The symmetric formulation of the simplex method for quadratic programming”,Econometrica 37 (1969) 507–527.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Von Hohenbalken, “A finite algorithm to maximize certain pseudo-concave functions on polytopes”,Mathematical Programming 9 (1975) 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Von Hohenbalken, “Simplicial decomposition in nonlinear programming”,Mathematical Programming 13 (1977) 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H.P. Künzi, W.K. Krelle and W. Oettli,Nonlinear programming (Blaisdell, Waltham, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was prepared as part of the activities of the Management Sciences Research Group, Carnegie-Mellon University, under Contract N00014-75-C-0621 NR 047-048 with the Office of Naval Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pang, JS. An equivalence between two algorithms for quadratic programming. Mathematical Programming 20, 152–165 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589342

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589342

Key words

Navigation