Abstract
Regional differences in production technologies and the effect of regulatory stringency — which differs across states — are analyzed for a sample of large U.S. commercial banks. Differences in both dimensions of production are found. Banks located in the midwestern states are found to be more adversely affected by regulation, however, to have a technology which enables them to be more resilient to regulatory induced distortions, i.e., they would produce more efficiently under comparable regulatory conditions. The policy implications of the results are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow K, Chenery H, Minhas B, Solow R (1961) Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency. Rev Econ Stat 43:225–250
Atkinson SE, Halvorsen R (1980) A test of relative and absolute price efficiency in regulated utilities. Rev Econ Stat 62:185–196
Atkinson SE, Halvorsen R (1984) Parametric efficiency tests, economies of scale, and input demand in U.S. electric power generation. Int Econ Rev 25:647–662
Baer H, Evanoff D, Fortier D, Mote L (1988) Geographic deregulation in banking and the public interest. Bank Regul 11:10–17
Bernake B (1981) Bankrupcy, liquidity, and recession. Am Econ Rev 71:155–159
Bernake B (1983) Nonmonetary effects of the financial crises in the propagation of the great depression. Am Econ Rev 73:257–276
Calomiris C, Hubbard RG, Stock J (1986) The farm debt crisis and public policy. Brook Papers Econ Act 2:441–485
Cameron R, Crips O, Patrick H, Tilly R (1967) Banking in the early stages of industrialization. Oxford University Press, New York
Evanoff D (1988) Branch banking and service accessibility. J Money, Credit Banking 20:191–202
Evanoff D, Israilevich P (1990) Cost economies and allocative efficiency of large U.S. commercial banks. Proceedings of a Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, vol 26. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago
Evanoff D, Israilevich P, Merris R (1990) Relative efficiency, technical change, and economies of scale for large commerical banks. J Regul Econ 2:281–298
Gilbert RA (1984) Bank market structure and competition. J Money, Credit Banking 16:617–644
Humphrey D (1990) Costs and technical change: effects from bank deregulation. Paper presented at the Franco-American Economic Seminar on Productivity Issues at the Micro Level. National Bureau of Economic Research Summer Institute
Hunter WC, Time SG (1986) Technical change, organization form, and the structure of bank production. J Money, Credit Banking 18:152–166
Israilevich P, Kowalewski KJ (1987) The effect of regulation on Ohio electric utilities. Fed Reserve Bank of Cleveland Econ Rev 10–19
Lande P (1978) The international comparison of production functions. Reg Sci Urban Econ 8:399–353
Lau LJ, Yotopoulos PA (1971) A test for relative efficiency and application to Indian agriculture. Am Econ Rev 61:94–109
Luger M, Evans W (1988) Geographic differences in production technology. Reg Sci Urban Econ 18:339–424
Pyle DH (1974) The losses on savings deposits from interest rate regulation. Bell J Econ Manag 5:614–622
Samuelson P (1952) A comment on factor price equalization. Rev Econ Studies 19:121–122
Shaffer S (1985) Competition, economies of scale, and diversity of firm sizes. Appl Econ 17:467–476
Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Startz R (1979) Implicit interest and demand deposits. J Monet Econ 5:515–534
Williamson SD (1987) Financial intermediation, business failures, and real business cycles. J Polit Econ 95:1196–1216
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Excellent data and research assistance by Betsy Dale and Peter Schneider is acknowledged. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and may not be shared by others including the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago or the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evanoff, D.D., Israilevich, P.R. Regional differences in bank efficiency and technology. Ann Reg Sci 25, 41–54 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581896
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581896