Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of value added in benefit/cost analysis

  • Contributed Articles
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem is to determine the role of value-added information in obtaining a measure of the benefits of public investment. Net benefit in a benefit/cost analysis is the change in economic surplus, i.e., the sum of the increase in consumer surplus and economic rent. An increase in productivity causes an increase in economic surplus. Thus, a productivity index is necessary but not sufficient information needed to measure the change in economic surplus. Information on value added can be used to establish productivity. Diewert's quadratic lemma is used to derive an index of productivity as the difference between indexes of value added and its primary components in the context of a non-homothetic production function. It is concluded that this same procedure should be used to measure productivity in either a taut or a slack economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chenery H (1986) Growth and transformation. In: Chenery H, Robinson S, Syrquin M (eds) Industrialization and growth: a comparative study. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 13–36

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooke SC (1985) A theory of consumer surplus and economic rent and an application for measuring the benefits from the mechanical cucumber harvester. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Michigan State University

  3. Diewert WE (1976) Exact and superlative index numbers. J Economet 4:115–145

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton J, Gardner R (1986) Value added and secondary benefits in regional pronjection evaluation: irrigation development in the Snake River basin. Ann Reg Sci 20(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rose R (1980) Supply shifts and research benefits: comment. Am J Agric Econ 62(4):834–837

    Google Scholar 

  6. Solow R (1970) Growth theory, an exposition. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stabler J, Van Kooten G, Meyer N (1988) Methodological issues in the evaluation of regional resource development projects. Ann Reg Sci 22(2):13–25

    Google Scholar 

  8. Young R, Gray S (1985) Input-output models, economic surplus, and the evaluation of state or regional water plans. Water Resour Res 21(12):1819–1823

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Idaho, 83843, Moscow, ID, USA

    Stephen C. Cooke

Authors
  1. Stephen C. Cooke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author would like to thank Judith Brown and Jack Stabler for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article.

This research was supported, in part, by interregional research project IR-6, the Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station project 054-H923, and a University of Idaho, Research Council Seed Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooke, S.C. The role of value added in benefit/cost analysis. Ann Reg Sci 25, 145–149 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581892

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581892

Keywords

Search

Navigation