Abstract
Recent research has emphasized path-dependence and the effect of vintage factors in urban development. Jerusalem and Tel Aviv are cities where the modern CBD is not in its historic location. Distance from the historic center is taken as a proxy of housing and infrastructure vintage. A polycentric urban population density function is used to assess the relative importance of distance from the CBD and from the historic center in explaining population density. Additionally, I examine econometrically the validity of a number of population density functions, and analyze the structure of the error variance and the design of appropriate measures of goodness of fit and hypothesis tests for regression models of population density. The results show that distance from the historical center is an important factor in explaining population density but its explanatory power has declined over time. It is more significant than distance from the CBD in explaining residential density in Tel Aviv and gross density in Jerusalem. It explains a larger proportion of the variance in gross density in the inner city than does distance from the CBD, but vice versa in the suburbs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen P, Sanglier M (1979) A dynamic model of a central place system. Geogr Anal 11:256–272
Allen P, Sanglier M (1981) A dynamic model of a central place system-II. Geogr Anal 13:141–164
Alonso W (1960) A theory of the urban land market. Pap Proc Reg Sci Assoc 6:149–158
Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Harvard Press, Cambridge
Alperovich G (1982) Density gradients and the identification of the central business district. Urban Stud 19:313–320
Alperovich G (1983) An empirical study of population density gradients and their determinants. J Reg Sci 23:529–540
Amemiya T (1985) Advanced econometrics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Anas A (1978) Dynamics of urban residential growth. J Urban Econ 5:66–87
Anselin L (1988a) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Anselin L (1988b) Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geogr Anal 20:1–17
Anselin L, Can A (1986) Model comparison and model validation issues in empirical work on urban density functions. Geogr Anal 18:179–197
Anselin L, Griffith D (1988) Do spatial effects really matter in regression analysis. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 65:11–34
Batty M, Longley P, Fotheringham S (1989) Urban growth and form: Scaling, fractal geometry and diffusion limited aggregation. Environ Planning A 21:1447–1472
Batty M (1991) Generating urban forms from diffusive growth. Environ Planning A 23:511–544
Berry B, Simmons J, Tennant R (1963) Urban population densities: Structure and change. Geogr Rev 53:389–405
Breusch T, Pagan A (1979) A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica 47:1287–1294
Brueckner J (1981) Testing a vintage model of urban growth. J Reg Sci 21:23–35
Brueckner J (1985) A switching regression analysis of urban population densities: preliminary results. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 56:71–87
Brueckner J (1986) A switching regression analysis of urban population densities. J Urban Econ 19:174–189
Buse A (1973) Goodness of fit in generalized least squares estimation. Am Statist 27(3):106–108
Casetti E (1967) Urban population density gradients: An alternate explanation. Can Geogr 11:96–100
Clark C (1951) Urban population densities. J R Statist Soc 114:490–496
Clarke M (1986) Non-linear dynamical systems theory and locational analysis. Eur J Oper Res 25:50–67
Couclelis H (1988) Of mice and men: What rodent populations can teach us about complex spatial dynamics. Environ Planning A 20:99–109
Crampton GR (1991) Residential density patterns in London — Any role left for the exponential density gradient? Environ Planning A 23:1007–1024
Edmonston B (1975) Population distribution in American cities. Lexington Books, Lexington
Frankena M (1978) A bias in estimating urban population density functions. J Urban Econ 5:35–45
Goldfeld S, Quandt R (1972) Nonlinear methods in econometrics. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam
Gordon P, Richardson H, Wong H (1986) The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: The case of Los Angeles. Environ Planning A 18:161–173
Gould P (1987) A critique of dissipative structure in the human realm. Eur J Oper Res 30:211–221
Greene D, Barnbrock J (1978) A note on problems in estimating exponential urban density models. J Urban Econ 5:285–290
Griffith D (1981) Modelling urban population density in a multicentered city. J Urban Econ 9:298–310
Haessel W (1978) Measuring goodness of fit in linear and nonlinear models. Southern Econ J 44:648–652
Harrison D, Kain JF (1974) Cumulative urban growth and urban density functions. J Urban Econ 1:61–98
Jerusalem Institute for Israel Research (1984) Jerusalem Statistical Yearbook No. 3, 1984. Jerusalem Institute for Israel Research, Jerusalem
MacDonald J (1989) Econometric studies of urban population density: A survey. J Urban Econ 26:361–385
Maddala G (1977) Econometrics. McGraw Hill, Singapore
Muth R (1961) The spatial structure of the housing market. Pap Proc Reg Sci Assoc 7:207–220
Muth R (1969) Cities and housing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Nairn AGM, O'Neill GJ (1988) Population density functions: a differential equation approach. J Reg Sci 28:89–102
Newling B (1969) Spatial variation of urban population densities. Geogr Rev 59:242–252
Nutt B, Sears A (1972) Functional obsolescence in the planned environment. Environ Planning 4:13–29
Odland J (1978) The conditions for multi-centered cities. Econ Geogr 54:234–244
Palumbo G, Sacks S, Wasylenko M (1990) Population decentralization within metropolitan areas: 1970–1980. J Urban Econ 27:151–167
Parr JB, O'Neill GJ, Nairn AGM (1988) Metropolitan density functions: A further exploration. Reg Sci Urban Econ 18:463–478
Parr JB, O'Neill, GJ (1989) Aspects of the lognormal function in the analysis of regional population distribution. Environ Planning A 21:961–973
Phipps M (1989) Dynamical behaviour of cellular automata under the constraint of neighbourhood coherence. Geogr Anal 21:197–215
Pumain D, Saint Julien T, Sanders L (1986) Urban dynamics of some French cities. Eur J Oper Res 25:3–10
Sacks S (1989) European cities: is population decline urban decline? Seminar presented in the Department of Geography, London School of Economics, London
State of Israel, Central Bureau of Statistics (1973) Census of Population and Housing 1972. Jerusalem
State of Israel, Central Bureau of Statistics (1984) Census of Population and Housing 1983. Jerusalem
Stern DI (1990) Ethno-ideological segregation and metropolitan development. Geoforum 21:397–409
Stern DI (1992) Population distribution in an ethno-ideologically divided city: The case of Jerusalem. Urban Geogr 13:164–186
Straussfogel D (1991) Modeling suburbanization as an evolutionary system dynamic. Geogr Anal 23:1–24
Thrall GI (1988) Statistical and theoretical issues in verifying the population density function. Urban Geogr 9:518–537
White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48:817–838
Wilson A (1981) Catastrophe theory and bifurcation. Croom Helm, London
Winsborough H (1961) A comparative study of urban populations densities. Ph D Thesis, Department of Sociology. University of Chicago, Chicago
Yone H, Shechter M (1990) Physical and environmental determinants of urban deterioration and rehabilitation: A conceptual framework and a case study. Environ Planning A 22:763–777
Zhang W-B (1988a) The pattern formation of an urban system. Geogr Anal 20:75–84
Zhang W-B (1988b) Urbanizing processes with moving boundaries. Geogr Anal 20:328–339
Zhang W-B (1989) Urban structural change in continuous time and space. Umea University Studies No 191, University of Umea, Umea, Sweden
Zhang W-B (1991) Synergetic economics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stern, D.I. Historical path-dependence of the urban population density gradient. Ann Reg Sci 28, 197–222 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581769
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581769