Skip to main content
Log in

Linear programming and the newton barrier flow

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this note we report a simple characteristic of linear programming central trajectories which has a surprising consequence. Specifically, we show that given a bounded polyhedral setP with nonempty interior, the logarithmic barrier function (with no objective component) induces a vector field of negative Newton directions which flows from the center ofP, along central trajectories, to solutions of every possible linear program onP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E.R. Barnes, “A variation on Karmarkar's algorithm for solving linear programming problems,”Mathematical Programming 36 (1986) 174–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.R. Barnes, S. Chopra and D. Jensen, manuscript in preparation, IBM Watson Research Center (Yorktown Heights, NY, 1987).

  • D.A. Bayer and J.C. Lagarias, “The nonlinear geometry of linear programming I. Affine and projective scaling trajectories,” AT&T Bell Laboratories (Murray Hill, NJ, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Bayer and J.C. Lagarias, “The nonlinear geometry of linear programming II. Legendre transform coordinates,” AT&T Bell Laboratories (Murray Hill, NJ, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Bayer and J.C. Lagarias, “The nonlinear geometry of linear programming III. Central trajectories,” AT&T Bell Laboratories (Murray Hill, NJ, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.E. Gill, W. Murray, M.A. Saunders, J.A. Tomlin and M.H. Wright, “On projected Newton barrier methods for linear programming and an equivalence to Karmarkar's projective method,”Mathematical Programming 36 (1986) 183–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.C. Gonzaga, “An algorithm for solving linear programming problems in O(n 3 L) operations,” Memorandum UCB/ERL M87/10, University of California (Berkeley, CA, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Karmarkar, “A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming,”Combinatorica 4 (1984) 373–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Lagarias, private communication (1986).

  • N. Megiddo, “Pathways to the optimal set in linear programming,” Research Report RJ 5295, IBM Almaden Research Center (San Jose, CA, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Megiddo and M. Shub, “Boundary behavior of interior point algorithms in linear programming,” Research report RJ 5319, IBM Watson Research Center (Yorktown Heights, NY, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Renegar, “A polynomial-time algorithm, based on Newton's method, for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 40 (1988) 59–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Sonnevend, “An analytical centre for a polyhedron and new classes of global algorithms for linear (smooth, convex) programming,” in:Proceedings of the 12th IFIP Conference on System Modeling (Budapest, 1985).

  • P.M. Vaidya, “An algorithm for linear programming which requires O(((m+n)n 2+(m+n)1.5 n)L) arithmetic operations,” AT&T Bell Laboratories (Murray Hill, NJ, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Vanderbei, M.J. Meketon and B.A. Freedman, “A modification of Karmarkar's linear programming algorithm,”Algorithmica 1 (1986) 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anstreicher, K.M. Linear programming and the newton barrier flow. Mathematical Programming 41, 367–373 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580774

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580774

Key words

Navigation