Skip to main content
Log in

Linear complementarity problems and multiple objective programming

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

An equivalence is demonstrated between solving a linear complementarity problem with general data and finding a certain subset of the efficient points of a multiple objective programming problem. A new multiple objective programming based approach to solving linear complementarity problems is presented. Results on existence, uniqueness and computational complexity are included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • H.P. Benson, “Existence of efficient solutions for vector maximization problems,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 26 (1978) 569–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Chankong and Y.Y. Haimes,Multiobjective Decision Making—Theory and Methodology (North-Holland, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, “Goal programming and multiple objective optimization—part 1,”European Journal of Operational Research 1 (1977) 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.J. Chung, “NP-completeness of the linear complementarity problem,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 60 (1989) 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Cottle and J.S. Pang, “On solving linear complementarity problems as linear programs,”Mathematical Programming Studies 7 (1978) 88–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Eaves, “On quadratic programming,”Management Science 17 (1971a) 698–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Eaves, “The linear complementarity problem,”Management Science 17 (1971b) 612–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Ecker and I.A. Kouada, “Finding efficient points for linear multiple objective programs,”Mathematical Programming 8 (1975) 375–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Gal, “On efficient sets in vector maximum problems—a brief survey,”European Journal of Operational Research 24 (1986) 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.B. Garcia, “Some classes of matrices in linear complementarity theory,”Mathematical Programming 5 (1973) 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.M. Geoffrion, “Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization,”Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 22 (1968) 618–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.-L. Hwang and A.S.M. Masud,Multiple Objective Decision Making—Methods and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Ignizio,Goal Programming and Extensions (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.M. Kostreva, “Block pivot methods for solving the complementarity problem,”Linear Algebra and its Applications 21 (1978) 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.M. Kostreva, “Nonconvexity in noncooperative game theory,”International Journal of Game Theory 18 (1989) 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.M. Kostreva, T.J. Ordoyne and M. Wiecek, “Multiple objective programming with polynomial objectives and constraints,”European Journal of Operational Research 57 (1992) 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.E. Lemke, “Bimatrix equilibrium points and mathematical programming,”Management Science 11 (1965) 681–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.G. Luenberger,Linear and Nonlinear Programming (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • O.L. Mangasarian, “Linear complementarity problems solvable by a single linear program,”Mathematical Programming 10 (1976) 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Martein, “Lagrange multipliers and generalized differentiable functions in vector extremum problems,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 63 (1989) 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.Q.V. Martins, “On a particular quadratic network problem,”European Journal of Operational Research 29 (1987) 317–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.G. Murty,Linear Complementarity, Linear and Nonlinear Programming (Heldermann Verlag, Berlin, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Pardalos and J.B. Rosen, “Global optimization approach to the linear complementarity problem,”SIAM Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computing 9 (1988) 341–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Pardalos, “Parallel search algorithms in global optimization,”Applied Mathematics and Computation 29 (1989) 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Rhode and R. Weber, “The range of the efficient frontier in multiple objective linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 28 (1984) 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Solow and P. Sengupta, “A finite descent theory for linear programming, piecewise linear minimization and the linear complementarity problem,”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 32 (1985) 417–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Szidarovszky, M.E. Gershon and L. Duckstein,Techniques for Multiobjective Decision Making in Systems Management (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Wendell and D.N. Lee, “Efficiency in multiple objective optimization problems,”Mathematical Programming 12 (1977) 406–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.A. Zadeh, “Optimality and nonscalar-valued performance criteria,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-8-1 (1963) 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kostreva, M.M., Wiecek, M.M. Linear complementarity problems and multiple objective programming. Mathematical Programming 60, 349–359 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580619

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580619

Key words

Navigation