Skip to main content
Log in

Consistent price and location conjectures in spatial competition models

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Remarkable advances have been made in spatial competition theory during the past three decades. Only in recent years, however, have the implications of firms' conjectural responses become well understood. Here research has largely focused on analyzing markets where prices (short run) or prices and locations (medium and long run) are exogenous. This paper examines the equilibium properties of spatial firms when prices and locations are consistent or endogenous. Price reaction equations are complemented with location reaction equations, consistency conditions are introduced, and numerical solutions are then given. While the simulations are confined to one-dimensional markets, equilibrium solutions unambiguously indicate how prices, locations, and profits are related to the costs of firms, the elasticity of consumer demand, and the presence or absence of market boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson SP (1986) Equilibrium existence in the circle model of product differentiation. In: Norman G (ed) Spatial pricing and differentiated markets. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari A, Economides N, Ghosh A (1993) Competitive positioning with non-uniform preferences. Discussion paper, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Aspremont C, Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse JF (1979) On Hotelling's stability in competition. Econometrica 47:1145–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon RW (1984) Consumer spatial behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann MJ (1968) Location theory. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann MJ, Thisse JF (1986) The location of production activities. In: Nijkamp P (ed) Handbook of regional and urban economics, Vol 1: regional economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson BL (1980) Löschian competition under alternative demand conditions. Am Econ Rev 70:1098–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Braid RM (1991) Two-dimensional Bertrand competition: block metric, Euclidean metric, and waves of entry. J Reg Sci 31:35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan T (1981) Duopoly models with consistent conjectures. Am Econ Rev 71:934–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Capozza DR, Van Order R (1977) Pricing under spatial competition and spatial monopoly. Econometrica 45:1329–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Capozza DR, Van Order R (1989) Spatial competition with consistent conjectures. J Reg Sci 29:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers N (1981) Location choice when price is also a decision variable. Ann Reg Sci 15:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudey M (1990) Competition by choice: the effect of consumer choice on firm location decisions. Am Econ Rev 81:1092–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudey A (1993) A note on consumer search, firm location choice, and welfare. J Ind Econ 41:323–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton BC (1976) Free entry in one-dimensional models: pure profits and multiple equilibria. J Reg Sci 16:21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton BC, Lipsey RG (1975) The principle of minimum differentation reconsidered: some new developments in the theory of spatial competition. Rev Econ Stud 62:27–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton BC, Lipsey RG (1976) The non-uniqueness of equilibrium in the Löschian location model. Am Econ Rev 66:77–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton BC, Lipsey RG (1978) Freedom of entry and the existence of pure profits. Econ J 88:455–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton BC, Wooders MH (1985) Sophisticated entry in a model of spatial competition. Rand J Econ 16:282–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides N (1984) The principle of minimum differentiation revisited. Eur Econ Rev 24:345–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides N (1993) Hotelling's main street with more than two competitors. J Reg Sci 33:303–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Fik TJ (1991) Price competition and node-linkage association. Pap Reg Sci 70:53–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J (1983) Oligopoly theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Ogawa H, Thisse JF (1988) A spatial competition approach to central place theory: some basic principles. J Reg Sci 28:477–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon CA (1972) Consumer demand, conjectural interdependence, and location equilibria in simple spatial duopoly. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 28:83–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn FH (1970) Some adjustment problems. Econometrica 38:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Haining RP (1983) Modeling intraurban price competition: an example of gasoline retailing. J Reg Sci 23:517–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick JM (1972) Comments on Colin A. Gannon's paper. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 28:109–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs BJ (1986) Mill pricing versus spatial price discrimination under Bertrand and Cournot spatial competition. J Ind Econ 35:173–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Holahan WL, Schuler RE (1981) Competitive entry in a spatial economy: market equilibrium and welfare implications. J Reg Sci 21:341–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1983) Conjectural variations. Can J Econ 16:191–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentnek B, Harwitz M, Narula SC (1987) A contextual theory of demand: beyond spatial analysis in economic geography. Econ Geogr 63:334–348

    Google Scholar 

  • McLafferty SL, Ghosh A (1986) Multipurpose shopping and the location of retail firms. Geogr Anal 18:215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan GF (1982) Equilibrium market area properties under two pricing systems. Geogr Anal 14:51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan GF (1993) Consistent price conjectures in one-dimensional markets. In: Lakshmanan TR, Nijkamp P (eds) Structure and change in the space economy: festschrift in honor of Martin J. Beckmann. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan GF, Fik TJ (1989) Price variation in spatial markets: the case of perfectly inelastic demand. Ann Reg Sci 23:187–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan GF, Fik TJ (1991) A reply to a note on price variation in spatial markets: the case of perfectly inelastic demand. Ann Reg Sci 25:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan GF, Fik TJ (1994) Price and location conjectures in medium-and long-run spatial competition models. J Reg Sci 34:179–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman G (1986) Spatial pricing and differentiated markets. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman G (1989) Monopolistic competition. Reg Sci Urban Econ 19:31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Novshek W (1980) Equilibrium in simple spatial (or differentiated product) models. J Econ Theory 22:313–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta H (1988) Spatial price theory of imperfect competition. Texas A & M University Press, College Station, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard E, Haining RP, Plummer P (1992) Spatial pricing in interdependent markets. J Reg Sci 32:55–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl K (1982) Consumer search and the spatial distribution of retailing. J Ind Econ 31:97–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill JC (1992a) Spatial competition and market interdependence. Pap Reg Sci 71:259–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill JC (1992b) Spatial duopolistic competition with multipurpose and multistop shopping. Ann Reg Sci 26:287–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber MJ (1974) Free entry and the locational equilibrium. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 64:17–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulligan, G.F., Fik, T.J. Consistent price and location conjectures in spatial competition models. Ann Reg Sci 29, 91–109 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580364

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580364

Keywords

Navigation