Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolutionary design theory using dynamic variation and thermodynamic selection

  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general evolutionary design theory is presented which incorporates variation processes and selection processes to design fluid/thermal/chemical devices. A biologically consistent view of evolution splits the process into variation and selection. The variation process is quantitatively modeled using dynamic equations that govern structural changes. Steady-state and stability of design variation is related to growth and decay factors and environmental control parameters. The selection process is quantitatively modeled using nonequilibrium thermodynamics to indicate performance. Both structure and environment contribute to entropy production. This requires computational modeling of fluid dynamics, heat transfer, chemical diffusion, and reactions. Special cases of engineering design evolution are shown theoretically and with a numerical example. The theory could rectify the impact of engineered structures on the natural environment and provide a basis for designing machines with coupled physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LaFleur, R.S., “The Role of Evolution in Design,” ASEE Bull. Design in Eng. Ed., Spring 1990, pp. 1–5

  2. Maher, M.L., “HI-RISE and beyond: directions for expert systems in design,” Comp. Aided Des., Vol. 17, No. 9, Nov., 1985, pp. 420–427

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feinstein, C.D.; Morris, P.A., “Information Trees: A Model of Information Flow in Complex Organizations,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 18, No. 3, May/June, 1988, pp. 390–401

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maher, M.L.; Zhao, F.; Gero, J.S., “An Approach to Knowledge-Based Creative Design,” Proc. NSF Eng. Design Res. Conf., Amherst, MA, June 1989, pp. 333–346

  5. Agogino, A.M.; Bradley, S.R.; Cagan, J.; Jain, P.; Michelena, N., “AI/OR Computational Model for Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Design Methods,” Proc. NSF Eng. Design Res. Conf., Amherst, MA, June 1989, pp. 97–112

  6. Cagan, J.; Agogino, A.M., “Innovative Design of Mechanical Structures From First Principles,” AI EDAM: Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 1(3): pp. 169–189.

  7. Prigogine, I.; Nicolis, G.; Babloyantz, A., “Thermodynamics of Evolution,” Physics Today, November 1972, pp. 23–28, and December 1972, pp. 38–44.

  8. Pollard, J. W., editor; Brooks, D.R.; Wiley, E.O.,Evolutionary Theory: Paths into the Future “Chapter 6, Evolution as an Entropic Phenomenon,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Riggs, D.S.,The Mathematical Approach to Physiological Problems MIT Press, Cambridge, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eigen, M.,Ingo Rechenberg Evolutionsstrategie Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologishen Evolution mit einem Nachwort von Manfred Eigen, Friedrich Frommann Verlag, Struttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 1973, pp. 33–37

    Google Scholar 

  11. French, M.J.,Invention and Evolution: Design in Nature and Engineering Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988, pp. 225, 256–260, 268.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LaFleur, R.S., “Evolutionary Design of an Endwall Juncture,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut, 1988, pp. 22–75

  13. Joskowicz, L., “Mechanism Comparison and Classification for Design,” Research in Engr. Design., Vol 1, Nos. 3/4, 1990, pp. 149–166

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lenat, D.B., “EURISKO: A Program That Learns New Heuristics and Domain Concepts,” Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 21, (1983), pp. 61–98

    Google Scholar 

  15. Finger, S.; Dixon, J.R., “A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Part I: Descriptive, Prescriptive, and Computer-Based Models of Design Processes,” Research in Engr. Design., Vol. 1, No. 1, 1989, pp. 51–67

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frieland, P; Kedes L. “Discovering the Secrets of DNA,” ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Issue, Computer, Nov., 1985, pp. 49–69

  17. Mayr, E., “Evolution,” Scientific American, Vol. 239, No. 3, September 1978, pp. 46–55

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, J.M., “Evolution and Development,” Sixth Symposium of the British Society for Development Biology: Development and Evolution, Ed. Goodwin, B.C., Holder, N.; Wylie, C.C., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983, pp. 33–45

    Google Scholar 

  19. May, R.M., “The Evolution of Ecological Systems,” Scientific American, Vol. 239, No. 3, September 1978, pp. 160–175

    Google Scholar 

  20. LaFleur, R.S., “Exploration of the Iceformation Method Applied to a Diffuser,” J. of Fluids Engr., September 1988, Vol. 110, pp. 244–250

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenman, M.A.; Gero, J.S., “Design codes as expert systems,” Comp. Aided Des., Vol. 17, No. 9, November, 1985

  22. Rege, A.; Agogino, A.M., “Topological Framework for Representing and Solving Probabilistic Inference Problems in Expert Systems,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 18, No. 3 May/June 1988, pp. 402–414

    Google Scholar 

  23. McDermott, D.; Davis, E., “Planning Routes through Uncertain Territory,” Artif. Intel., Vol. 22, 1984, pp. 107–156.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro, V.; Voelcker, H., “On the Role of Geometry in Mechanical Design,” Research in Engr. Design., Vol. 1, No. 1, 1989, pp. 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, W.C.; Azarm, S., “Parameter Sensitivity Analysis in Two-Level Design Optimization,” Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Des., Vol. 112, September 1990, pp. 354–361

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rosen, R.,Optimality Principles in Biology Plenum Press, New York, 1967, pp. 80–90

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kline, S.J.,Similitude and Approximation Theory McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mandelbrot, B.B.,The Fractal Geometry of Nature W.H. Freeman, New York, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  29. Volterra, V., “Calculus of Variations and the Logistic Curve,”The Golden Age of Theoretical Ecology: 1923–1940 Ed. Scudo, F.M.; Ziegler, J.R., A Collection of Works by V. Volterra, V. A. Kostitzin, A.J. Lotka, A.N. Kolmogoroff, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Vol. 22, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978, pp. 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kostitzin, V.A., “The Logistic Law and its Generalizations,”The Golden Age of Theoretical Ecology: 1923–1940 Ed. Scudo, F.M.; Ziegler, J.R., A Collection of Works by V. Volterra, V.A. Kostitzin, A.J. Lotka, A.N. Kolmogoroff, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Vol. 22, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978, pp. 28–33

    Google Scholar 

  31. Post W.M.; Travis, C.C.; DeAngelis, D.L., “Evolution of Mutualism Between Species,”Differential Equations and Applications in Ecology, Epidemics, and Population Problems Ed. Busenberg, S.N.; Cooke, K.L., Academic Press, New York, 1981, pp. 183–201

    Google Scholar 

  32. Verhulst, F.,Nonlinear Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  33. Murthy, N.S.; Gero, J.S.; Radford, A.D., “Multifunctional Material System Design,” J. Struct. Engr., Vol. 112, No. 11, November 1986, pp. 2430–2446

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lev-Ari, H.; Parker, S.R.; Kailath, T., “Multidimensional Maximum-Entropy Covariance Extension,” IEEE Trans. Information Theory, Vol. 35, No. 3, May 1989, pp. 497–508

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ruggeri, T., “Convexity and symmetrization in relativistic theories,” Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, No. 2, 1990, pp. 163–177

  36. Horne, W.C.; Smith, C.A. Karamcheti, K., “Some Aeroacoustic and Aerodynamic Applications of the Theory of Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics,” Proc. AIAA 13th Aeroacoustics Conf., Tallahassee, FL. October 1990

  37. Bejan, A.,Entropy Generation through Heat and Fluid Flow John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982, pp. 98–101 and preface

    Google Scholar 

  38. Moran, M.,Availability Analysis ASME Press, New York, 1989, pp. 46–55

    Google Scholar 

  39. de Groot, S.R.; Mazur, P.,Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics Dover, New York, 1984, pp. 20–27, 53–56, 307–308

    Google Scholar 

  40. LaFleur, R.S., “Evolution Theory for Optimal Control of a Couette Iceform Design Model,” under review by International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

  41. Zukauskas, A.; Ziugzda, J.,Heat Transfer of a Cylinder in Crossflow Hemisphere Pub., New York, 1985, pp. 140–142

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cao, M.; Ferris, M.C., “On Jargon: Genetic Algorithms in Optimization,” UMAP Journal, 12.1, 1990, pp. 81–90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Clarkson University, 13699, Potsdam, NY, USA

    Ronald Samuel LaFleur

Authors
  1. Ronald Samuel LaFleur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LaFleur, R.S. Evolutionary design theory using dynamic variation and thermodynamic selection. Research in Engineering Design 3, 39–55 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580067

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580067

Keywords

Search

Navigation