Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 45–51 | Cite as

A comparison of the measurement characteristics of two circumferential penile transducers

  • D. R. Laws
Article

Abstract

The measurement characteristics of two transducers which record penile circumference changes were compared. The subject wore two transducers simultaneously while viewing a section of an erotic film. Examination of the data revealed discrepancies in measurement between the two units, but these differences were shown to be statistically nonsignificant. Various measurement characteristics of the devices such as durability, ease of handling, and cost are discussed and recommendations are made to guide the worker in choosing a unit most suitable for clinical and research applications.

Key words

penile transducer measurement characteristics mercury strain gauge mechanical strain gauge penile erection human males 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, G. G., and Blanchard, E. B. (1975). The measurement and generation of sexual arousal in male sexual deviates. In Hersen, M., Eisler, R., and Miller, P. M. (eds.),Progress in Behavior Modification, Vol. II, Academic Press, New York, pp. 99–136.Google Scholar
  2. Abel, G. G., Blanchard, E. B., Barlow, D. H., and Mavissakalian, M. (1975). Identifying specific erotic cues in sexual deviations by audiotaped descriptions.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 8: 247–260.Google Scholar
  3. Bancroft, J. (1974).Deviant Sexual Behaviour Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Bancroft, J. H. J., Jones, H. G., and Pullan, B. R. (1966). A simple transducer for measuring penile erection, with comments on its use in the treatment of sexual disorders.Behav. Res. Ther. 4: 239–242.Google Scholar
  5. Barlow, D. H. (1975). Personal communication, February 13.Google Scholar
  6. Barlow, D. H., Becker, R., Leitenberg, H., and Agras, W. S. (1970). A mechanical strain gauge for recording penile circumference change.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 3: 73–76.Google Scholar
  7. Farrall, W. R. (1975). Personal communication, July 16.Google Scholar
  8. Freund, K. (1967). Erotic preference in pedophilia.Behav. Res. Ther. 5: 339–348.Google Scholar
  9. Freund, K., Sedlacek, F., and Knob, K. (1965). A simple transducer for plethysmography of the male genital.J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 8: 169–170.Google Scholar
  10. Freund, K., Langevin, R., and Barlow, D. H. (1974). Comparison of two penile measures of erotic arousal.Behav. Res. Ther. 12: 355–359.Google Scholar
  11. Laws, D. R., and Bow, R. A. (1976). An improved mechanical strain gauge for recording penile circumference change.Psychophysiology 13: (in press).Google Scholar
  12. Laws, D. R., and Pawlowski, A. V. (1974). An automated fading procedure to alter sexual responsiveness in pedophiles.J. Homosex. 1: 149–163.Google Scholar
  13. McConaghy, N. (1967). Penile volume change to moving pictures of male and female nudes in heterosexual and homosexual males.Behav. Res. Ther. 5: 43–48.Google Scholar
  14. McConaghy, N. (1974). Measurements of change in penile dimensions.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3: 381–388.Google Scholar
  15. Rosen, R. C. (1975). Personal communication, June 15.Google Scholar
  16. Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Laws
    • 1
  1. 1.Atascadero State HospitalAtascaderoUSA

Personalised recommendations