Skip to main content
Log in

A survey of cohabitation on two college campuses

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cohabitation emerged in the late 1960s because of relaxed housing rules, the availability of the “pill,” a philosophy held by a plurality of students regarding the desirability of sex accompanying affection, and, perhaps, a need on the part of some students for a primary relationship. Some empirical data on the climate in which cohabitation emerged on two colleges are presented. A limited portrait of some of the characteristics of students who would cohabit or had cohabitated and the conditions under which they would consider entering into this arrangement is also provided. Data from this study revealed that a plurality of students on both campuses felt that cohabitation was acceptable when it was part of a relationship involving either planned marriage or affection. In addition, willingness to cohabit as well as cohabitation was more common among (1) males than females, (2) Jewish than Catholic and Protestant students, and (3) low church attendance students than high church attendance students. Between 10% and 15% of the students on the campuses were cohabiting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block, D. M. D. (1969). Unwed couples: Do they live happily ever after.Redbook 90: 140, 142–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowles Special (in cooperation with United Press International) (1968).Morals Crowles Education Corporation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemesrud, J. (1968). An arrangement: Living together for convenience, security, sex.New York Times, March 4, p. 40.

  • McWhinter, W. A. (1968). The arrangement at college.Life May 31, pp. 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek (1966). Unstructured relations. July 4, pp. 78–79.

  • Reiss, I. L. (1967).The Social Context of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, J. (1966). Are you a teenager, I guess so.Look Magazine, September 29, pp. 44–49.

  • Wynn, D. (1967).Esquire 68(3): 94–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silverman, I.J. A survey of cohabitation on two college campuses. Arch Sex Behav 6, 11–20 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01579243

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01579243

Key words

Navigation