Abstract
In this paper we give several generalized theorems concerning reducibility notions to certain complexity classes. We study classes that are either (I) closed under NP many-one reductions and polynomial-time conjunctive reductions or (II) closed under coNP many-one reductions and polynomial-time disjunctive reductions. We prove that, for such a classK, (1) reducibility notions of sets toK under polynomial-time constant-round truth-table reducibility, polynomial-time log-Turing reducibility, logspace constant-round truth-table reducibility, logspace log-Turing reducibility, and logspace Turing reducibility are all equivalent and (2) every set that is polynomial-time positive Turing reducible to a set inK is already inK.
From these results, we derive some observations on the reducibility notions to C=P and NP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Beigel, R. Chang, and M. Ogiwara, A relationship between difference hierarchies and relativized polynomial hierarchies,Math. Systems Theory 26 (1993), 293–310. Also available as Technical Report TR 91-1184, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1991.
R. Beigel, J. Gill, and U. Hertrampf, Counting classes: thresholds, parity, mods, and fewness,Proc. 7th Symp. on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 415, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1990), pp. 49–57.
R. Beigel, L. A. Hemachandra, and G. Wechsung, Probabilistic polynomial time is closed under parity reductions.Inform. Process. Lett. 37 (1991), 91–94.
R. Beigel, N. Reingold, and D. Spielman, PP is closed under intersection.Proc. 23rd ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (1991), pp. 1–9.
S. R. Buss and L. Hay, On truth-table reducibility to SAT and the difference hierarchy over NP,Proc. 3rd IEEE Conf. on Structure in Complexity Theory (1988), pp. 224–233.
J. Cai and L. A. Hemachandra, On the power of parity polynomial time,Math. Systems Theory 23 (1990), 95–106.
S. A. Cook, The complexity of theorem proving procedures,Proc. 3rd ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (1971), pp. 151–158.
L. Fortnow and N. Reingold, PP is closed under truth-table reductions.Proc. 6th IEEE Conf. on Structure in Complexity Theory (1991), pp. 13–15.
J. Gill, Computational complexity of probabilistic Turing machines,SIAM J. Comput. 6 (1975), 675–695.
F. Green, On the power of deterministic reductions to C=P,Math. Systems Theory 26 (1993), 215–233.
T. Gundermann, N. Nasser, and G. Wechsung, A survey of counting classes,Proc. 5th IEEE Symp. on Structure in Complexity Theory (1990), pp. 140–153.
L. Hemachandra, The strong exponential hierarchy collapses,J. Comput. System Sci. 39 (1989), 299–322.
R. Karp, Reducibility among combinatorial problems, in R. E. Miller and J. W. Thatcher (eds.),Complexity of Computer Computations, Plenum, New York (1982), pp. 85–113.
J. Köbler, U. Schöning, and K. W. Wagner, The difference and truth-table hierarchies of NP,Theoret. Inform. Applications (RAIRO) 21 (1987), 419–435.
M. Krentel, The complexity of optimization problems,J. Comput. System Sci. 36 (1988), 490–509.
R. Ladner and N. Lynch, Relativization of questions about logspace computability,Math. Systems Theory 10 (1976), 19–32.
R. Ladner, N. Lynch, and A. Selman, A comparison of polynomial-time reducibilities,Theoret. Comput. Sci. 1 (1975), 103–123.
M. Ogiwara, On the computational power of exact counting, Manuscript, April 1990.
M. Ogiwara and L. Hemachandra, A complexity theory for feasible closure properties,Proc. 6th IEEE Symp. on Structure in Complexity Theory (1991), pp. 16–29.
C. Papadimitriou and S. Zachos, Two remarks on the power of counting,Proc. 6th GI Conference on Theoretical Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 145, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1983), pp. 269–276.
D. A. Russo, Structural properties of complexity classes, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mathematics, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 1985.
A. Selman, Reductions on NP and P-selective sets,Theoret. Comput. Sci. 19 (1982), 287–304.
J. Simon, On some central problems in computational complexity, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1975.
J. Tarui, Randomized polynomials, threshold circuits, and the polynomial hierarchy,Proc. 8th Symp. on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 480, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1991), pp. 238–250.
S. Toda, On the computational power of PP and ⊕P,Proc. 30th IEEE Symp. on Foundation of Computer Science (1989), pp. 514–519.
S. Toda, On polynomial-time truth-table reducibility to C=P sets, Colloquium at the Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, October 1990.
S. Toda and M. Ogiwara, Counting classes are at least as hard as the polynomial-time hierarchy,SIAM J. Comput. 21 (1992), 316–328.
L. G. Valiant, The complexity of computing the permanent,Theoret. Comput. Sci. 8 (1979), 189–201.
K. W. Wagner, The complexity of combinatorial problems with succinct input representation,Acta Inform. 23 (1986), 325–356.
K. W. Wagner, More complicated questions about maxima and minima, and some closures of NP,Theoret. Comput. Sci. 51 (1987), 53–80.
K. W. Wagner, Bounded query computations,Proc. 3rd IEEE Conf. on Structure in Complexity Theory (1988), pp. 224–233.
K. W. Wagner, On restricting the access to an NP oracle,Proc. 16th Conf. on Algorithm and Linear Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 317, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1989), pp. 682–696.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogiwara, M. Generalized theorems on relationships among reducibility notions to certain complexity classes. Math. Systems Theory 27, 189–200 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01578841
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01578841