Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized theorems on relationships among reducibility notions to certain complexity classes

  • Published:
Mathematical systems theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we give several generalized theorems concerning reducibility notions to certain complexity classes. We study classes that are either (I) closed under NP many-one reductions and polynomial-time conjunctive reductions or (II) closed under coNP many-one reductions and polynomial-time disjunctive reductions. We prove that, for such a classK, (1) reducibility notions of sets toK under polynomial-time constant-round truth-table reducibility, polynomial-time log-Turing reducibility, logspace constant-round truth-table reducibility, logspace log-Turing reducibility, and logspace Turing reducibility are all equivalent and (2) every set that is polynomial-time positive Turing reducible to a set inK is already inK.

From these results, we derive some observations on the reducibility notions to C=P and NP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Beigel, R. Chang, and M. Ogiwara, A relationship between difference hierarchies and relativized polynomial hierarchies,Math. Systems Theory 26 (1993), 293–310. Also available as Technical Report TR 91-1184, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Beigel, J. Gill, and U. Hertrampf, Counting classes: thresholds, parity, mods, and fewness,Proc. 7th Symp. on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 415, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1990), pp. 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Beigel, L. A. Hemachandra, and G. Wechsung, Probabilistic polynomial time is closed under parity reductions.Inform. Process. Lett. 37 (1991), 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Beigel, N. Reingold, and D. Spielman, PP is closed under intersection.Proc. 23rd ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (1991), pp. 1–9.

  5. S. R. Buss and L. Hay, On truth-table reducibility to SAT and the difference hierarchy over NP,Proc. 3rd IEEE Conf. on Structure in Complexity Theory (1988), pp. 224–233.

  6. J. Cai and L. A. Hemachandra, On the power of parity polynomial time,Math. Systems Theory 23 (1990), 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. A. Cook, The complexity of theorem proving procedures,Proc. 3rd ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (1971), pp. 151–158.

  8. L. Fortnow and N. Reingold, PP is closed under truth-table reductions.Proc. 6th IEEE Conf. on Structure in Complexity Theory (1991), pp. 13–15.

  9. J. Gill, Computational complexity of probabilistic Turing machines,SIAM J. Comput. 6 (1975), 675–695.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Green, On the power of deterministic reductions to C=P,Math. Systems Theory 26 (1993), 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Gundermann, N. Nasser, and G. Wechsung, A survey of counting classes,Proc. 5th IEEE Symp. on Structure in Complexity Theory (1990), pp. 140–153.

  12. L. Hemachandra, The strong exponential hierarchy collapses,J. Comput. System Sci. 39 (1989), 299–322.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Karp, Reducibility among combinatorial problems, in R. E. Miller and J. W. Thatcher (eds.),Complexity of Computer Computations, Plenum, New York (1982), pp. 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Köbler, U. Schöning, and K. W. Wagner, The difference and truth-table hierarchies of NP,Theoret. Inform. Applications (RAIRO) 21 (1987), 419–435.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Krentel, The complexity of optimization problems,J. Comput. System Sci. 36 (1988), 490–509.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Ladner and N. Lynch, Relativization of questions about logspace computability,Math. Systems Theory 10 (1976), 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Ladner, N. Lynch, and A. Selman, A comparison of polynomial-time reducibilities,Theoret. Comput. Sci. 1 (1975), 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Ogiwara, On the computational power of exact counting, Manuscript, April 1990.

  19. M. Ogiwara and L. Hemachandra, A complexity theory for feasible closure properties,Proc. 6th IEEE Symp. on Structure in Complexity Theory (1991), pp. 16–29.

  20. C. Papadimitriou and S. Zachos, Two remarks on the power of counting,Proc. 6th GI Conference on Theoretical Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 145, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1983), pp. 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. A. Russo, Structural properties of complexity classes, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mathematics, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Selman, Reductions on NP and P-selective sets,Theoret. Comput. Sci. 19 (1982), 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Simon, On some central problems in computational complexity, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Tarui, Randomized polynomials, threshold circuits, and the polynomial hierarchy,Proc. 8th Symp. on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 480, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1991), pp. 238–250.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Toda, On the computational power of PP and ⊕P,Proc. 30th IEEE Symp. on Foundation of Computer Science (1989), pp. 514–519.

  26. S. Toda, On polynomial-time truth-table reducibility to C=P sets, Colloquium at the Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, October 1990.

  27. S. Toda and M. Ogiwara, Counting classes are at least as hard as the polynomial-time hierarchy,SIAM J. Comput. 21 (1992), 316–328.

    Google Scholar 

  28. L. G. Valiant, The complexity of computing the permanent,Theoret. Comput. Sci. 8 (1979), 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. W. Wagner, The complexity of combinatorial problems with succinct input representation,Acta Inform. 23 (1986), 325–356.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. W. Wagner, More complicated questions about maxima and minima, and some closures of NP,Theoret. Comput. Sci. 51 (1987), 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  31. K. W. Wagner, Bounded query computations,Proc. 3rd IEEE Conf. on Structure in Complexity Theory (1988), pp. 224–233.

  32. K. W. Wagner, On restricting the access to an NP oracle,Proc. 16th Conf. on Algorithm and Linear Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 317, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1989), pp. 682–696.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogiwara, M. Generalized theorems on relationships among reducibility notions to certain complexity classes. Math. Systems Theory 27, 189–200 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01578841

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01578841

Keywords

Navigation