Abstract
After pointing out that the two-gluon decay mode of theZ 0 vanishes, we calculate, in detail, the differential and the total decay rates forZ 0→ggg. Using the standard Glashow-Weinberg-Salam model and Quantum Chromodynamics, we find a branching ratio of 1.8×10−5. We also discussZ→ggγ andZ 0→γγγ. As a natural extension of this work, we present the details of a calculation of the differential and the total cross sections for the processe + e −→ggg mediated by a virtual photon in the continuum. A detailed comparison with\(e^ + e^ - \to q\bar qg\) and a brief discussion ofe + e −→ggγ ande + e −→γγγ are also given.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.L. Perl:e + e − Physics today and tomorrow. SLAC-PUB-2615, September 1980 (unpublished); C.H. Llewellyn Smith:e + e − Physics beyond PETRA energies. LEP Summer Study/1-2, October,1978
B. Guberina et al.: Nucl. Phys.B174, 317 (1980)
H.P. Nilles: Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 319 (1980); T. Rizzo: Phys. Rev.D 22, 2213 (1980)
R. Cahn, M.S. Chanowitz, N. Fleishon: Phys. Lett.82 B, 113 (1979)
T.R. Grose, K.O. Mikaelian. Phys. Rev.D23, 123 (1981)
M.I. Laursen, K.O. Mikaelian, M.A. Samuel. Phys. Rev.D23, 2795 (1981)
C.N. Yang: Phys. Rev.77, 242 (1950)
V. Costantini, B. De Tollis, G. Pistoni: Nuovo Cimento2A, 733 (1971); B. De Tollis: Nuovo Cimento32, 757 (1964);35, 1182 (1965); R. Karplus, M. Neuman: Phys. Rev.83, 776 (1951)
K. Fabricius, I. Schmitt, G. Schierholz, B. Kramer: Phys. Lett.91 B, 431 (1980); J.G. Körner, G. chierholtz, J. Willrodt: Nucl. Phys.B 185, 365 (1981); K. Fabricius et al.: Z. Phys. C-Particles and Fields11, 315 (1982)
Reports by the MARK-J, PLUTO, TASSO and JADE collaborations in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies. T.B.W. Kirk, H. Abarbanel, Eds., 1979 (Batavia, Illinois). For a recent review see G. Wolf: DESY Preprint 80/85 (unpublished)
J. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard, G.G. Ross: Nucl. Phys.B111, 253 (1976); T.A. DeGrand, Y.J. Ng, S.H.H. Tye: Phys. Rev.D 16, 3251 (1977); G. Sterman, S. Weinberg: PHys. Rev. Lett.39, 1436 (1977). For a recent review see T.F. Walsh: Proceedings of Vanderbilt Symposium one + e − Interactions, AIP (1980)
M.L. Laursen, K.O. Mikaelian, M.A. Samuel: Phys. Rev.D25, 710 (1982)
H.P. Nilles, K.H. Streng: Phys. Rev.D 23, 1944 (1981)
S.J. Brodsky, J.F. Gunion: Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 402 (1976); E.G. Floratos, F. Hayot, A. Morel: Phys. Lett.90 B, 297 (1980); H.P. Nilles: Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 319 (1980)
F.E. Close: An introduction to quarks and partons. New York: Academic Press 1979
S.L. Adler: Phys. Rev.177, 2426 (1969); J.S. Bell, R. Jackiw: Nuovo Cimento60 A, 47 (1969); L. Rosenberg: Phys. Rev.129, 2786 (1963)
In going from the Pauli metrie (ict) to the covariant metric, one uses the substitution ruleP 4→iP 0
E. Byckling, K. Kajantie. Particle kinematics. London: Wiley 1973
C. Chlouber, M.A. Samuel: Comp. Phys. Comm.15, 513 (1978)
J. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard, G.G. Ross: Nucl. Phys.B 111, 253 (1976)
G.P. Lepage: VEGAS. J. Comp. Phys.27, 192 (1978)
We useα s =4π/7 log(M 2 Z Λ 2)≃0.17 and sin2 θ w ≃0.23
Here, as well as in Sect. VI, we have assumed that the gluons are, in principle, distinguishable and, therefore, have not included the statistical factors 1/n! in the total cross-sections and total rates (n is the number of identical particles in the final state). If, however, one considers indistinguishablegluon jets, the factor 1/n! should be included
E.G. Floratos, F. Hayot, A. Morel: Phys. Lett.90 B, 297 (1980); H.P. Nilles, K.H. Streng: Phys. Rev.D 23 1944 (1981); S.J. Brodsky, J.F. Gunion: Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 402 (1976)
D.R. Yennie, S.C. Frautschi, H. Suura: Ann. Phys.13, 379 (1961)
F. Bloch, A. Nordsieck. Phys. Rev.52, 54 (1937)
T.D. Lee, M. Nauenberg: Phys. Rev.133, B 1549 (1964); T. Kinoshita: J. Math. Phys.3, 650 (1962)
R.D. Field: Perturbative quantum chromodynamics and applications to large momentum-transfer processes. NATO Advanced Study Institute on Quantum Flavordynamics, Quantum Chromodynamics, and Unified Theories, Boulder, Colorado 1979 (Plenum Press, N.Y. 1980)
J.G. Korner et al.: Phys. Lett.94 B, 207 (1980); K. Fabricius, I. Schmitt: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields3, 51 (1979)
Ellis et al.: and erratum Nucl. Phys.B 130, 516 (1977)
N. Bilic, S. Meljanac: Production of gluon jets via the Zo resonance, unpublished (1981)
Asx i →0,x j →1 andx k →1, wherei,j,k=1, 2 or 3
V. Baîer, E. Kurayev, V. Fadin: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31, 364 (1980)
The integrals are taken from the work of T.R. Grose and K.O. Mikaelian, [5]. Eqn. (6–33) is valid for arbitrary ε, 0<ε≦1/3. For small ε≦0.01 this result agrees with the expansion given by Ellis et al.
We have included thet quark in\(\alpha _s = \frac{{12\pi }}{{(33 - 2n_f )\log \left( {\frac{{Q^2 }}{{mq2}}} \right)}}\) and set\(n_f = 6,\sum\limits_i {q_i } = 1\), though eur approximationmq≪Q will fail fort quarks atQ=40 GeV ifm t ≧20 GeV
J.D. Bjorken: Memo to SP-ly experimenters (1975); see also J. Ellis et al.:111, 253 (1976)
L. Lewin: Dilogariths and Associated Functions. MacDonald, London, 1958
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laursen, M.L., Samuel, M.A. Z 0 decay and electron positron annihilation into three gluons. Z. Phys. C - Particles and Fields 14, 325–344 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01578654
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01578654