Abstract
The capsule formed around an implant contracts and tends to become spherical, a tendency limited by the consistency of the implant. Another factor in this is the size of the implantation pocket. If the pocket fits too tightly, spherical development occurs earlier and becomes more marked. A “dead space” between the tissues and the implant, on the other hand, leads to proliferation in the wall of the pocket and hence a thickened capsule.
The spherical form of the breast and its firmness need not necessarily be due to fibrotic thickening of the capsule, and the diagnosis of “constrictive fibrosis” does not always apply. The same symptoms may result from contraction of a thin capsule when the implantation pocket was made too small.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Domanskis, E. J., and Owsley, J. Q.: Histological investigation of the etiology of capsule contracture following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 58:689, 1976.
Höhler, H.: Further progress in the axillary approach in augmentation mammaplasty: prevention of incapsulation. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 1:107, 1977.
Šmahel, J.: Histology of the capsules causing constrictive fibrosis around breast implants. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 30:324, 1977.
Šmahel, J.: Tissue reactions to breast implants coated with polyurethane. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 61:80, 1978.
Šmahel, J.: Fibrous reactions in the tissues surrounding silicone breast prostheses. Br. J. Plast. Surg. (in press).
Wilflingseder, P., Propst, A., and Mikuz, G.: Constrictive fibrosis following silicone implants in mammary augmentation. Chir. Plast. 2:215, 1974.
Williams, Ch., Aston, S., and Rees, T. D.: The effect of hematoma on the thickness of pseudosheaths around silicone implants. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 56:194, 1975.
Williams, J. E.: Experiences with a large series of silastic breast implants. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 49:253, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šmahel, J. Constriction of the capsule around breast prostheses. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 2, 435–441 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577983
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577983