Skip to main content
Log in

“False bursa” concept in augmentation mammaplasty

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural feeling breasts are a primary objective to be achieved in the augmentation mammaplasty procedure. Rather than attempt to totally prevent a fibrous capsule from forming about the implant, it should be converted into a larger “false bursa” containing a freely mobile soft implant of modern design with no fixation patches. This relationship must be maintained through many months of the postoperative period to ensure a lasting result. Failure to achieve the false bursa concept results in a tight immobile noncompressible breast that has an unnatural feel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Courtiss, E. H., Webster, R. C. and White, M. F.: Selection of alternatives in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 54:552, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman, B. S.: Successful treatment of some fibrous envelope contractures around breast implants. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 50:107, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cronin, T. D. and Greenberg, R. L.: Our experience with the Silastic gel breast prosthesis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 46:1, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cronin, T. D. and Gerow, F. J.: Augmentation mammaplasty: A new “natural feel” prosthesis. Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic Surgery. Excerpta Medica Foundation. Amsterdam, 1964, pp. 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cholnoky, T. de: Augmentation mammaplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 45:573, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Snyder, B. B.: Planning an augmentation mammaplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 54:132, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barney, B. B.: Augmentation mammaplasty with two different kinds of prosthesis in the same woman. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 54:265, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grossman, A. R.: The current status of augmentation mammaplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 52:1, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams, J. E.: Experiences with a large series of Silastic breast Implants. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 49:253, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes, W. E., Jr.: Avoidable pitfalls in augmentation mammaplasty. South. Med. J. 68:703, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williams, C., Aston, S. and Rees, T. D.: The effect of hematoma on the thickness of pseudosheaths around silicone implants. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 56:194, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weiner, D. L., Aiache, A. E. and Silver, L.: A new soft, round, silicone gel breast implant. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 53:174, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peterson, H. D. and Burt, G. B., Jr.: The role of steroids in prevention of circumferential capsular scarring in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 54:28, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foerster, D.W. “False bursa” concept in augmentation mammaplasty. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 2, 419–424 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577980

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577980

Key Words

Navigation