Skip to main content
Log in

Current status of liquid injectable silicone

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the inception of the recently concluded formal study, liquid injectable silicone has been both used and abused by many. Reports in both lay and professional literature reflect this experience in the form of a wide range of opinions and judgments regarding the use of this material in corrective surgery. Those intimately involved in the former study agree that, used properly, liquid injectable silicone appears to have redeeming value in at least a limited group of problem situations. These investigators further agree that its general use could lead to many problems unless its limited scope of usefulness and proper use are known, accepted, and abided by those using it. To satisfy the lingering doubts raised by the many negative reports, further controlled study is also indicated. Until there is a method of control over the general clinical use of liquid silicone and until persistent questions on its safety and efficacy, over a protracted period of time, are answered, the investigators are convinced that the substance should not be made generally available. Designed before the complexity required of a proper study was appreciated, the original research protocol lacked sufficient detail and was broad and vague in scope. The Dow-Corning Company and its investigators therefore recommended the termination of the study and set about planning a new research protocol that would supply more complete information in a much more restricted area of clinical need. This was done with the cooperation of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons and was submitted for approval by the FDA along with an expanded group of clinical investigators selected with the help of the ASPRS, with consideration given to their even geographic distribution. This new research study was submitted to the FDA and approved. Accordingly, on March 1, 1978, a much more vigorous, detailed, and restrictive study, confined to major tissue defects of the head and neck, was resumed by a larger group of investigators representing the ASPRS supervised by a medical monitor acceptable to all. Hopefully, this study, which will occupy a period of 7 years and a limited number of patients, plus the rigorous efforts to trace and document those involved in the earlier study and the tracking down and full documentation of all known complications, will ultimately bring the true status of liquid injectable silicone into proper and generally acceptable perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrews, J. M.: Cellular behavior to injected silicone fluid: a preliminary report. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 38:581, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashley, F. L., et al.: The present status of silicone fluid in soft tissue augmentation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 37:464, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashley, F. L., et al.: Present status of silicone fluid in soft tissue augmentation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 39:411, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ballantyne, D. L., Rees, T. D., and Seidman, I.: Silicone fluid response to massive injections of dimethyl-polysiloxane fluid in animals. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 36:330, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Hur, N., and Neuman, Z.: Siliconoma—another cutaneous response to dimethyl-polysiloxane. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 36:629, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blocksma, R., and Braley, S.: The silicones in plastic surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 35:366, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Braley, S. A.: Commentary on silicones (Editorial). Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 34:632, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Braley, S.: Silicone fluids with added adulterants (Letter to the Editor). Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 45:288, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Braley, S.: Silicone fluid for soft tissue augmentation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 47:343, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chaplin, C. H.: Loss of both breasts from injections of silicone (with additive). Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 44:447, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, M.: Objections to injections of liquid silicone (Letter to the Editor). Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 46:597, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murray, J. E.: Factors for safety in use of silicone (Editorial). Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 39:427, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rees, T. D., Platt, J., and Ballantyne, D.: An investigation of cutaneous response to dimethylpolysiloxane (silicone liquid) in animals and humans: a preliminary report. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 35:131, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rees, T. D., et al.: Visceral response to subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injections of silicone in mice. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 39:402, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rees, T. D., Ballantyne, D. L., Jr., and Hawthorne, G. A.: Silicone fluid research: a follow-up summary. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 46:50, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sadusk, J. F., Jr.: Silicones (Letter to the Editor). Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 37:251, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goulian, D. Current status of liquid injectable silicone. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 2, 247–250 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577957

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577957

Keywords

Navigation