Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Knee joint muscle function after patellectomy: how important are the hamstrings?

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Twenty-three patients who had undergone unilateral patellectomy were tested using the Cybex II isokinetic dynamometer 9 years postoperatively. The results were compared with the performance of the uninvolved joint. There was a good correlation between loss of the quadriceps muscle function and loss of the hamstrings muscle function at 60 deg/s (R=0.7,P<0.001). Patients who showed a loss of quadriceps function of less than 40% also maintained good hamstrings function. A good or excellent functional result could be expected in these patients. If the loss of quadriceps function was more than 40%, a proportional loss of flexion torque was seen, indicating a functional impairment of the knee joint muscles not solely attributable to the loss of the lever arm. Furthermore, all patients with a loss of peak flexion torque of more than 30% showed an unsatisfactory clinical result. The evaluation of the hamstrings muscles by measuring the peak flexion moment at 60 deg/s can therefore be used as a preoperative assessment and as a guideline for rehabilitation after patellectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blatter G, Jackson RW, Bayne O, Magerl F (1987) Patellectomy as a salvage operation. Orthopäde 16: 310–316

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cantin S, Laroche C, Lavallee P, Lessard JM (1993) Patellectomy: results of a long-term follow-up. Can J Surg 36: 461–463

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davies GJ (1987) A compendium of isokinetics in clinical usage, 3rd edn. S & S Publishers, Wisconsin, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  4. Einola S, Aho AJ, Kallio P (1976) Patellectomy after fracture: long-term follow-up results with special reference to functional disability. Acta Orthop Scand 47: 441–447

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jakobsen J, Christensen KS, Rasmussen OS (1985) Patellectomy — a 20-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Scand 56: 430–432

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufer H (1971) Mechanical function of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 53: 1551–1560

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lennox IA, Cobb AG, Knowles J, Bentley G (1994) Knee function after patellectomy. A 12-to 48-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76: 485–487

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nisell R, Ericson M (1992) Patellar forces during isokinetic knee extension. Clin Biomech 7: 104–108

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peeples RE, Margo MK (1978) Function after patellectomy. Clin Orthop 132: 180–186

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sutton FS, Thompson CH, Lipke J, Kettelkamp DB (1976) The effect of patellectomy on knee function. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 58: 537–540

    Google Scholar 

  11. Watkins MP, Harris BA, Wender S, Zarins B, Rowe CR (1983) Effect of patellectomy on the function of the quadriceps and hamstrings. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65: 390–395

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wendt PP, Johnson RP (1985) A study of quadriceps excurison, torque, and the effect of patellectomy on cadaver knees. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67: 726–732

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ziran BH, Goodfellow DB, Deluca LS, Heiple KG (1994) Knee function after patellectomy and cruciform repair of the extensor mechanism. Clin Orthop 302: 138–146

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuster, M., Blatter, G. Knee joint muscle function after patellectomy: how important are the hamstrings?. Knee Surg, Sports traumatol, Arthroscopy 4, 160–163 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577410

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577410

Key words

Navigation