Summary
When glucose and fructose are fermented separately, the uptake profiles indicate that both sugars are utilized at similar rates. However, when fermentations are conducted in media containing an equal concentration of glucose and fructose, glucose is utilized at approximately twice the rate of fructose. The preferential uptake of glucose also occurred when sucrose, which was first rapidly hydrolyzed into glucose and fructose by the action of the enzyme invertase, was employed as a substrate. Similar results were observed in the fermentation of brewer's wort and wort containing 30% sucrose and 30% glucose as adjuncts. In addition, the high levels of glucose in the wort exerted severe catabolite repression on maltose utilization in theSaccharmyces uvarum (carlsbergensis) brewing strain. Kinetic analysis of glucose and fructose uptake inSaccharomyces cerevisiae revealed aK m of 1.6 mM for glucose and 20 mM for fructose. Thus, the yeast strain has a higher affinity for glucose than fructose. Growth on glucose or fructose had no repressible effect on the uptake of either sugar. In addition, glucose inhibited fructose uptake by 60% and likewise fructose inhibited, glucose uptake by 40%. These results indicate that glucose and fructose share the same membrane transport components.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bisson, L.F. and D.G. Fraenkel. 1983. Involvement of kinases in glucose and fructose uptake bySaccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80: 1730–1734.
Bisson, L.F. and D.G. Fraenkel. 1984. Expression of kinasedependent glucose uptake inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 159: 1013–1017.
Bisson, L.F., L. Neigeborn, M. Carlson and D.G. Fraenkel. 1987. TheSNF3 gene is required for high-affinity glucose transport inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 169: 1656–1662.
Cason, D.T., G.C. Reid and E.M.S. Gatner. 1987. On the differing rates of fructose and glucose utilization inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Inst. Brew. 93:23–25.
Hockney, R.C. and R.F. Freeman. 1980. Gratuitous catabolite repression by glucosamine of maltose utilization ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 121: 479–482.
Hopkins, R.H. and R.H. Roberts. 1935. Kinetics of alcoholic fermentation of sugar by brewer's yeast. II Relative rates of fermentation of glucose and fructose. Biochem. J. 29: 931–936.
Orlowski, J.H. and J.P. Barford. 1987. The mechanism of uptake of multiple sugars bySaccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture under fully aerobic conditions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 459–463.
Panchal, C.J. and G.G. Stewart. 1982. The influence of media conditions on the utilization of monosaccharides by a strain ofSaccharomyces uvarum (carlsbergensis). J. Inst. Brew. 87: 278–281.
Stewart, G.G., J. Erratt, I. Garrison, T. Goring and I. Hancock. 1979. Studies on the utilization of wort carbohydrates by brewer's yeast strains. MBAA Tech. Quart. 16:543–549.
Stewart, G.G., C.J. Panchal, I. Russell and A.M. Sills. 1982. Advances in ethanol from sugars and starch—a panoramic paper. In: Ethanol from Biomass (Duckworth, H.E. and E.A. Thompson, eds.), pp. 4–57, Royal Society of Canada, Ottawa.
Stewart, G.G., I. Russell and A.M. Sills. 1983. Factors that control the utilization of wort carbohydrates by yeast. MBAA Tech Quart. 20:1–8.
Stewart, G.G., R.M. Jones and I. Russell. 1985. The use of derepressed yeast mutants in the fermentation of brewing yeast. European Brewery Convention: Proceedings of the 20th Congress, Helsinki, pp. 243–250, IRL Press, Oxford.
Stewart, G.G., T. D'Amore, C.J. Panchal and I. Russell. 1989. Regulation of sugar uptake in yeasts. Inst. Brew. Proc. Conv. (Aust. and N.Z. Sect.), 20, in press.
Thirwell, A.J. and R.L. Busby. 1982. Liquid sugar as a brewing adjunct. Inst. Brew. Proc. Conv. (Aust. and N.Z. Sect.) 17: 77–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D'Amore, T., Russell, I. & Stewart, G.G. Sugar utilization by yeast during fermentation. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 4, 315–323 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577355
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577355