Abstract
This article examines youth politics employing Mannheim's theory of generation units. Specifically, a multivariate model was constructed to test and compare sets of social location and consciousness factors explaining political behavior among two random samples of college and noncollege youth. Just prior to the 1972 presidential election, 373 Syracuse University students and 134 local Syracuse residents between the ages of 18 and 25 were surveyed to determine their presidential candidate support and urge to participate in a demonstration. Path analysis was used to examine the direct, indirect, and total effects of the variables in the model. Results indicated that (1) the relationships predicting youth politics differed within and between the two youth groups; (2) 55% of the variance in presidential candidate support and 33% of the variance in urge to demonstrate were explained by the variables in the college student model, and the comparable figures for the noncollege group were 39% and 38%, respectively; (3) family status and personal political attitudes differentiated candidate support and urge to demonstrate among college students, while demographic characteristics, family status, and institutional confidence explained considerable variance in politics among the noncollege youth. The form of Mannheim's generation unit model provided a useful tool for comparing youth groups within the same generation; the contents await replication and verification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron, W. (1974). Student activism of the 1960s revisited: A multivariate analysis research note.Soc. Forces 52: 408–414.
Auger, C., Barton, A., and Maurice, R. (1969). The nature of the student movement and radical proposals for change at Columbia University.Hum. Factor 9: 18–40.
Berger, B. M. (1960). How long is a generation?Br. J. Sociol. 11: 10–23.
Bettelheim, B. (1963). The problem of generations. In Erikson, E. H. (ed.),Youth Change and Challenge, Basic Books, New York.
Blalock, H. M. (ed.) (1974).Measurement in the Social Sciences, Aldine, Chicago.
Block, J. H., Haan, N., and Smith, M. B. (1968). Activism and apathy in contemporary adolescence. In Adams, J. F. (ed.),Contributions to the Understanding of Adolescence, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
Braungart, R. G. (1969). Family status, socialization and student politics: A multivariate analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
Braungart, R. G. (1971). Family status, socialization and student politics: A multivariate analysis.Am. J. Sociol. 77: 108–130.
Braungart, R. G., and Braungart, M. M. (1974). Protest attitudes and behavior among college youth: A U.S. case study.Youth Soc. 6: 219–248.
Brunswick, A. F. (1970). What generation gap?Soc. Probl. 17: 358–371.
Clarke, J. W., and Egan, J. (1970). Social and political dimensions of campus protest activity. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Social Research, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
Dawson, R. E., and Prewitt, K. (1969).Political Socialization, Little, Brown, Boston.
Denisoff, R. S., and Levine, M. H. (1970). Generations and counter-culture: A study in the ideology of music.Youth Soc. 2: 33–58.
Dennis, J. (ed.) (1973).Socialization to Politics, Wiley, New York.
Duncan, O. D. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples.Am. J. Sociol. 72: 1–16.
Dunlap, R. (1970). Radical and conservative student activists: A comparison of family backgrounds.Pacific Sociol. Rev. 13: 171–181.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1956).From Generation to Generation, Free Press, New York.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1963). Archetypal patterns of youth. In Erikson, E. H. (ed.),Youth: Change and Challenge, Basic Books, New York.
Erikson, E. H. (1968).Identity: Youth and Crisis, Norton, New York.
Fendrich, J. M. (1974). Activists ten years later: A test of generational unit continuity.J. Soc. Issues 30: 95–118.
Fenton, J. H., and Gleason, G. (1969). Student power at the University of Massachusetts: A case study. Bureau of Government Research, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Flacks, R. (1967). The liberated generation: Exploration of the roots of student protest.J. Soc. Issues 23: 52–75.
Flacks, R. (1971).Youth and Social Change, Markham, Chicago.
Geschwender, J. A., Rinehart, J. W., and George, P. M. (1974). Socialization, alienation, and student activism.Youth Soc. 5: 303–325.
Heberle, R. (1951).Social Movements, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
Heise, D. R. (1972). Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analysis.Sociol. Meth. Res. 1: 147–173.
Hyman, H. H. (1959).Political Socialization, Free Press, New York.
Jaros, D. (1973).Socialization to Politics, Praeger, New York.
Kandel, D. (1974). Inter- and intragenerational influences on adolescent marijuana use.J. Soc. Issues 30: 107–135.
Kasschau, P., Ransford, H. E., and Bengtson, V. L. (1974). Generational consciousness and youth movement participation: Contrasts in blue collar and white collar youth.J. Soc. Issues 30: 69–94.
Keniston, K. (1968).Young Radicals, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.
Kerlinger, F., and Pedhazur, E. J. (1973).Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Kerpelman, L. C. (1972).Activists and Nonactivists, Behavioral Publications, New York.
Kirby, D. (1971). A counter-culture explanation of student activism.Soc. Probl. 19: 203–216.
Kline, F. G., and Clarke, P. (eds.) (1971).Mass Communications and Youth: Some Current Perspectives, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
Kornberg, A., and Brehm, M. L. (1971). Ideology, institutional identification, and campus activism.Soc. Forces 49: 445–459.
Labovitz, S. (1967). Some observations on measurement and statistics.Soc. Forces 46: 151–160.
Lambert, T. A. (1970). Karl Mannheim and the sociology of generations. Paper presented to the annual meetings of the Eastern Sociological Society, New York.
Lambert, T. A. (1972). Generations and change: Toward a theory of generations as a force in historical process.Youth Soc. 4: 21–45.
Land, K. C. (1969). Principles of path analysis. In Borgatta, E. F. (ed.),Sociological Methodology 1969, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Lane, R. E. (1964).Political Life, Free Press, New York.
Laufer, R. S., and Bengtson, V. L. (1974). Generations, aging, and social stratification: On the development of generation units.J. Soc. Issues 30: 181–205.
Lewis, R. A. (1971). Socialization into national violence: Familial correlates of hawkish attitudes toward war.J. Marriage Family 33: 699–708.
Lewis, S. H., and Kraut, R. E. (1972). Correlates of student political activism and ideology.J. Soc. Issues 28: 131–149.
Liebert, R. (1971).Radical and Militant Youth, Praeger, New York.
Lipset, S. M. (1968).Revolution and Counterrevolution, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.
Lipset, S. M., and Ladd, E. C. (1971). College generations: From the 1930s to the 1960s.Publ. Interest 25: 99–113.
Mannheim, K. (1936).Ideology and Utopia, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.
Mannheim, K. (1944).Diagnosis of Our Time, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Mannheim, K. (1952).Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Matthews, D. R., and Prothro, J. W. (1966). Negro students and the protest movement. In Matthews, D. R., and Prothro, J. W. (eds.),Negroes and the New Southern Politics, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.
Meier, H. C., and Orzen, W. (1971). Student legitimation of campus activism: Some survey findings.Soc. Probl. 19: 181–192.
Miles, M. W. (1971).The Radical Probe, Atheneum, New York.
Parsons, T. (1963). Youth in the context of American society. In Erikson, E. H. (ed.),Youth: Change and Challenge, Basic Books, New York.
Peterson, R. E., and Bilorusky, J. A. (1971).May 1970: The Campus Aftermath of Cambodia and Kent State, Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, Berkeley, Calif.
Rosenthal, J. (1973). Youth vote held of little impact.New York Times, January 3.
Schiff, L. F. (1966). Dynamic young fogeys: Rebels on the right.Transaction 4: 30–36.
Selvin, H. C., and Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). Determinants of support for civil liberties. In Lipset, S. M., and Wolin, S. S. (eds.),The Berkeley Student Revolt, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.
Sewell, W. H., and Shah, V. P. (1968). Social class, parental encouragement, and educational aspirations.Am. J. Sociol. 73: 559–572.
Silvern, L. E., and Nakamura, C. Y. (1973). An analysis of the relationship between students' political position and the extent to which they deviate from parents' position.J. Soc. Issues 29: 111–132.
Simirenko, A. (1966). Mannheim's generational analysis and acculturation.Br. J. Sociol. 17: 292–299.
Smith, R. B. (1972). The Vietnam war and student militancy. In Nimmo, D., and Bonjean, C. M. (eds.),Political Attitudes and Public Opinion, David McKay, New York.
Solomon, F., and Fishman, J. (1964). Youth and peace: A psychosocial study of student peace demonstrators in Washington, D.C.J. Soc. Issues 20: 54–73.
Spaeth, J. (1968). Occupational prestige expectations among male college graduates.Am. J. Sociol. 73: 548–558.
Sullivan, J. L. (1974). Multiple indicators: Some criteria of selection. In Blalock, H. M. (ed.),Measurement in the Social Sciences, Aldine, Chicago.
Thomas, L. E. (1971). Family correlates of student political activism.Dev. Psychol. 4: 206–214.
Watts, W. A., and Whittaker, D. (1966). Free Speech advocates at Berkeley.J. Applied Behav. Sci. 2: 41–62.
Watts, W. A., Lynch, S., and Whittaker, D. (1969). Alienation and activism in today's college-age youth: Socialization patterns and current family relationships.J. Counsel. Psychol. 75: 1–7.
Westby, D. L., and Braungart, R. G. (1966). Class and politics in the family backgrounds of student political activists.Am. Sociol. Rev. 31: 690–692.
Yankelovich, D. (1972).The Changing Values on Campus, Washington Square Press, New York.
Yankelovich, D. (1974).The New Morality: A Profile of American Youth in the 70's, Mc-Graw-Hill, New York.
Zeitlin, M. (1966). Political generations in the Cuban working class.Am. J. Sociol. 71: 493–508.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received Ph.D. from Pennsylvania State University, 1969. Major research interests include political socialization, youth movements, and the sociology of generations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braungart, R.G. College and noncollege youth politics in 1972: An application of Mannheim's generation unit model. J Youth Adolescence 5, 325–347 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577247
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577247