Abstract
We study through QCD sum rules the connection between the invariant quark mass difference\(\hat m_s - \hat m_u\) and the scalar form factor of the reactionK 0→π − μ + v μ in the physical region. We use both theoretical information, (the value off +(0) and the Callan-Treiman relation, includingm π 2/m k 2 corrections) and experimental one (the value ofλ 0 from a linear fit) to give a lower bound for\(\hat m_s - \hat m_u\). Taking the world most recent fitted value forλ 0,λ 0 = 0.025, which may be reasonably identified with the slope att=0, andf + (0) ≈ 0.98, we obtain\(\hat m_s - \hat m_u\) ≥ 250 MeV for\(\Lambda _{\overline {MS} }\) = 150 MeV. The relevant hypotheses and experimental trends are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Leutwyler: Nucl. Phys.B76, 413 (1974); S. Weinberg: The mass problem. In: Festschrift for I.I. Rabi. Ed. Motz. New York: Academy of Sciences, New York 1977; D.J. Gross, J.B. Treiman. F. Wilczek: Phys. Rev.D19, 2188 (1979); P. Langacker, H. Pagel: Phys. Rev.D19, 2070 (1979); P. Langacker: Phys. Rev.D20, 2983 (1979); M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov: Nucl. Phys.B147, 519 (1979); J. Gasser. Ann. Phys.136, 62 (1981); S. Narison, E. de Rafael: Phys. Lett.103B, 57 (1981); C. Roiesnel, T.N. Truong: Nucl. Phys.B187, 293 (1981); T.N. Truong; Phys. Lett.117B, 109 (1982); J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler: Phys. Rep.87C, 79 (1982)
M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov: Nucl. Phys.B147, 385 (1979)
S. Narison, N. Paver, E. de Rafael, D. Treleani: Nucl. Phys.B212, 365 (1983)
P. Estabrooks et al.: Nucl. Phys.B133, 490 (1978); D. Aston et al.: Phys. Lett.106B, 235 (1981)
C. Bourrely, B. Machet, E. de Rafael: Nucl. Phys.B189, 157 (1981)
J. Broadhurst: Phys. Lett.101B, 423 (1981)
D.R.T. Jones: Nucl. Phys.B75, 531 (1974); W. Caswell: Phys. Rev. Lett.33, 244 (1974); (b) R. Tarrach: Nucl. Phys.B183, 384 (1981); O. Nachtmann, W. Wetzel: Nucl. Phys.B187, 33 (1981)
B. Guberina, R. Meckbach, R.D. Peccei, R. Rückl: Nucl. Phys.B184, 476 (1981); R.A. Bertlmann: Nucl. Phys.B204, 387 (1982); R.A. Bertlmann: preprint CERN TH 3440 (1982); L. Durand, B. Durand, J.B. Whitenton: Fermilab Pubs. 82/88 THY and 82/89 THY; J. Broadhurst: Phys. Lett.123B, 251 (1983)
S. Okubo: Phys. Rev.B3, 2807 (1971); S. Okubo: Phys. Rev.D4, 725 (1971); S. Okubo, I. Fu Shih: Phys. Rev.D4, 2020 (1971); I. Fu. Shih, S. Okubo: Phys. Rev.D4, 3519 (1971)
M. Gell Mann, J.R. Oakes, B. Renner: Phys. Rev.175, 2195 (1968)
M. Ademollo, R. Gatto: Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 264 (1965); (b) M. Bace, D.T. Cornwell; Phys. Rev.D10, 2964 (1974)
C.D. Buchanan et al.: Phys. Rev.D11, 457 (1975)
C.G. Callan, S.B. Treiman: Phys. Rev. Lett.16, 197 (1966); (b) C.A. Dominguez, Phys. Lett.86B, 171 (1979)
Review of particle properties: Phys. Lett.111B, (1982)
G. Donaldson et al.: Phys. Rev.D9, 2939 (1974)
Y. Cho et al.: Phys. Rev.D22, 2688 (1980)
V.K. Birulev et al.: Nucl. Phys.B182, 1 (1981)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of High Energy and Nuclear physics, Division of High Energy Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC03-76SF00098
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Machet, B. M s −M u quark mass difference and the scalar form factor ofK 0 μ3 reaction. Z. Phys. C - Particles and Fields 21, 223–227 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577035
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01577035