Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Advantages of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the study of prostatic disease include a precise anatomical display in multiple planes, superb contrast resolution, and differential physicochemical characteristics that are obtained without known toxicity. In practice, however, MRI has not been shown to differentiate consistently between normal and abnormal prostatic tissue. Although normal prostatic and periprostatic anatomy is clearly defined in T1-weighted images, controversy persists as to the precise differential characteristics of inflammatory and neoplastic disease within the prostate. Thus, MRI is not presently adequate for prostate cancer screening. MRI has been shown to be superior to computerized axial tomography (CAT) for pelvic staging of prostate cancer; however, comparative studies involving other modalities with precise histologic confirmation are limited and the improvement reported is modest. There is some evidence that MRI may be helpful in the detection of prostate cancer metastatic to bone, but, again, information is limited. Substantial advances in MRI techniques such as optimal pulse sequencing, surface coils, and, possibly, paramagnetic contrast agents will be required to secure a role for MRI in prostate cancer evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biondetti PR, Lee JKT, Ling D, Catalona WJ (1987) Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR Imaging. Radiology 162:325–329

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bryan PJ, Butler HE, LiPuma JP (1983) NMR scanning of the pelvis: initial experience with 0.3 T system. Am J Roentgenol 141:1111–1118

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bryan PJ, Butler HE, LiPuma JP (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis. Radiol Clin North Am 22:897–915

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bryan PJ, Butler HE, Nelson AD et al. (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Am J Roentgenol 146:543–548

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buonocore E, Hesemann C, Pavlicek W, Montie J (1984) Clinical and in vitro magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 143:1267–1272

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carrol CL, Sommer FG, McNeal JE, Stamey TA (1987) The abnormal prostate: MR imaging at 1.5 T with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 163:521–525

    Google Scholar 

  7. Demas BE, Hricak H, Williams RD (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of urologic malignancies. Semin Urol 3:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dooms GC, Hricak H, Crooks LE, Higgins CC (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lymph nodes: comparison with CT. Radiology 153:719–728

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hricak H, Williams RD, Spring DB et al. (1983) Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Roentgenol 141:1101–1110

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hricak H, Dooms GC, Jeffrey RB et al. (1987) Prostatic carcinoma: staging by clinical assessment, CT, and MR imaging. Radiology 162:331–336

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kulkarni MV, Shaff MI, Carter MM et al. (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis. Radio Graphics 5:611–625

    Google Scholar 

  12. Larkin BT, Berquist TH, Utz DC (1986) Evaluation of the prostate by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 4:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JKT, Rholl KS (1986) MRI of the bladder and prostate. Am J Roentgenol 147:732–736

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ling D, Lee JKT, Heiken JP et al. (1986) Prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia; inability or MR imaging to distinguish between the two diseases. Radiology 158:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  15. McNeal JE (1983) The prostate gland: morphology and pathology. Monogr Urol 4:3–33

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mukamel E, Hannah J, Zoran B, DeKernion JB (1986) The value of computerized tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging in staging prostatic carcinoma: comparison with the clinical and histological staging. J Urol 136:1231–1233

    Google Scholar 

  17. Poon PY, McCallum RW, Henkelman MM et al. (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Radiology 154:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steyn JH, Smith FW (1982) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Br J Urol 54:726–728

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williams RD, Hricak H (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging in urology. J Urol 132:641–649

    Google Scholar 

  20. Williams RD, Dunn V, Abu-Yousef M, Brown C (1986) Staging of pelvic malignancies by MRI (Abstract 482). J Urol 135:224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwon, E.D., Williams, R.D. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer. World J Urol 7, 17–21 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01576839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01576839

Keywords

Navigation