Skip to main content
Log in

Storage-phosphor digital radiography in genitourinary radiology

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A digital-projection radiography system with potential applications in genitourinary imaging is presented. The system replaces the traditional film-screen combinations by storage phosphor screens but continues to use cassettes in conventional X-ray equipment. Technical features such as consistently optimal image brightness and contrast across an extremely wide exposure range and edge-enhancement capabilities overcome deficiencies seen with conventional film-screen systems, such as improper exposure and poor contrast discrimination. Images obtained with a dual-energy radiation spectrum selectively demonstrate soft-tissue- or bone-equivalent structures and diminish the obscuring effect of bowel gas. Problems resulting from the singular reliance on film as a display and storage medium in conventional radiography are resolved in digital radiography by fast and simultaneous electronic access to images that can be displayed on high-resolution monitors or laser-printed films. The basic technical features of storage-phosphor digital imaging as compared to conventional radiography are described. A summary of recently published results relevant to genitourinary examinations is given and radiographic examples are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aspelin P, Petterson H, Boijsen E (1988) Digital radiography using laser stimulated luminescense for evaluation of urinary calcifications. Acta Radiol 29:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brody WR, Cassel DM, Sommer FG, Lehmann LA, Macovski A, Alvarez RE, Pelc NJ, Riederer SJ, Hall AL (1981) Dual-energy projection radiography: initial clinical experience. AJR 137:201–205

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bunge RE, Herman CL (1987) Usage of diagnostic imaging procedures: a nationwide hospital study. Radiology 163:569–573

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ergun DL, Mistretta CA, Brown DE, Bystrianik RT, Sze WK, Picoult CL, Kelcz F, Naidich DP (1988) Dual energy phosphor cassette for computed radiography. RSNA scientific program, vol 168 [Suppl], abstract 228

  5. Fajardo LL, Hillman BJ, Hunter TB, Claypool HR, Westerman BR, Mockbee BM (1987) Excretory urography using computed radiography. Radiology 162:345–351

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ishida M, Frank PH, Doi K, Lehr JL (1983) High quality digital radiographic images. Improved detection of low-contrast objects and preliminary clinical studies. RadioGraphics 34:325–330

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ishigaki T, Sakuma S, Horikawa Y, Ikeda M, Yamuguchi H (1986) One-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging. Radiology 161:271–273

    Google Scholar 

  8. John HE (1969) The physics of radiology, 2nd edn. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, pp 574–579

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kalender WA, Klotz E, Kostaridou L (1988) An algorithm for noise suppression in dual energy CT material density images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 7:218–224

    Google Scholar 

  10. Petterson H, Aspelin P, Bojsen E (1988) Digital urography using stimulable phosphors: an experimental study in the rabbit. Acta Radiol 29:273–275

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prokop M, Doehring W (1985) A noise reduction method for dual energy CT (abstract). Radiology 157(P):339

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rimkus D, Baily NA (1984) Patient exposure requirements for high contrast resolution in digital radiographic systems. AJR 142:603–608

    Google Scholar 

  13. Salvini E, Abbona M, Barigozzi P, Favini G, Pedroli G, Crespi A, Pastori R, Cerutti R, Stacul F (1989) La radiografia digitale in urografia. Radiol Med (Torino) 77:44–50

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schaefer CM, Oestmann JW, Greene R, Kamalsky J, Hall D, Llewellyn J, Robertson C, Rhea J, Rosenthal H, Rubens J, Shepard JA, Templeton P (1989) Improved control of image optical density in low dose storage phosphor imaging. Radiology 173:713–716

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schaefer CM, Bhatta K, Dretler SP, Greene R (1989) Digital imaging of urinary calculi (abstract). International Congress of Radiology, Paris, p 370

  16. Schreyer H, Vogler E (1985) Qualitätskriterien in der Röntgendiagnostik der Nieren und Harnwege. In: Stender HS, Stieve FE (eds) Qualitätssicherung in der Röntgendiagnostik. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart New York, pp 76–84

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sommer FG, Brody WR, Gross D, Macovski A, Hall A, Pelc N (1981) Excretory urography using dual-energy scannd projection radiography. Radiology 141:529–532

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sommer FG, Brody WR, Gross D, Macovski A (1982) Renal imaging with dual-energy projection radiography. AJR 138:317–322

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, Kato H (1983) Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology 148:833–838

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stender HS, Stieve FE (1985) Image quality — physical and diagnostic parameters. The radiologists view point. J Radiol 18 [Suppl]: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schaefer, C., Prokop, M., Truss, M. et al. Storage-phosphor digital radiography in genitourinary radiology. World J Urol 8, 143–149 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01576760

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01576760

Keywords

Navigation