Skip to main content
Log in

Single potential analysis of cavernous electric activity —a possible diagnosis of autonomic impotence?

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The aim of our study was to examine the cavernous smooth-muscle electric activity in normal and impotent patients as well as in those with (presumably) well-defined neurologic lesions. Single potential analysis of cavernous electric activity (SPACE) was done in 12 consecutive impotent patients, 34 normal patients, and 19 patients referred especially for SPACE. In the normal patients, similar potentials with a mean duration of 9.5 s, a mean amplitude of 153 μV and a mean polyphasity of 8.5 were recorded (cutoff frequencies, 2–2000 Hz), with cutoff frequencies set at 0.5–500 Hz, the mean duration was 12.8 s, amplitude was 444 μV and the mean polyphasity was 13.8 Upper spinal cord lesions showed potentials of long duration as well as whips and bursts. Patients with lower motor-neuron lesions showed either short potentials of high amplitude or potentials of small amplitude. In 49% of the impotent patients, abnormal SPACE was found. Our results suggest that SPACE is a reproducible and minimally invasive method for the diagnosis of autonomic neurogenic impotence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellenberg M (1980) Development of urinary bladder dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. An Intern Med 92:321–324

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gerstenberg TC, Nordling J, Hald H, Wagner G (1989) Standardized evaluation of erectile dysfunction in 95 consecutive patients. J Urol 141:857–861

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jevtich MJ (1983) Non-invasive vascular and neurogenic tests in use for evaluation of angiogenic impotence. Int Angiogr 3:964–969

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laivas JG, Zayed AA, Labib KB (1981) The bulbocavernous reflex in urology. J Urol 126:197–200

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lavoisier P, Proulx J, Courtois F, Carful F (1989) Bulbocavernous reflex. J Urol 141:311–315

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lue TF, Hricak H, Marich KW, Tanagho EA (1985) Vasculogenic impotence evaluated by high-resolution ultrasonography and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis. Radiology 155:777–781

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lue TF, Hricak H, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA (1986) Functional evaluation of penile veins by cavernosography in papaverine-induced erection. J Urol 135:479–484

    Google Scholar 

  8. Siroky MB, Sax DS, Krane RJ (1979) Sacral signal tracing. J Urol 122:661–665

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stief CG, Bähren W, Gall H, Scherb W (1988) Functional evaluation of penile hemodynamics. J Urol 139:734–737

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wagner G, Gerstenberg T (1988) Human in vivo studies of electrical activity of corpus cavernosum. J Urol 139:327A

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner G, Gerstenberg T, Levin RJ (1989) Electrical activity of corpus cavernosum during flaccidity and erection of the human penis. J Urol 142:723–727

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stief, C.G., Djamilian, M., Schaebsdau, F. et al. Single potential analysis of cavernous electric activity —a possible diagnosis of autonomic impotence?. World J Urol 8, 75–79 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01576351

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01576351

Keywords

Navigation