Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosis and technical refinements in rhytidectomy: A personal approach

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scared look caused by the overcorrection of the frontal area and mobilization of the lateral canthus of the eye and mouth are frequent complications or failures in rhytidectomy. These complications are usually related to poor surgical planning originating at imprecise preoperatory diagnosis. Many problems can be avoided and the results improved when the patient undergoes a meticulous preoperatory examination and a precise diagnosis is achieved in each facial segment. This allows the appropriate surgical technique to be chosen for each case, including the full orbital septum opening to sculpture the eyelids, the liposuction and SMAS plication to sculpture the face, and cervical and submental platysma plication to sculpture the neck. The presented standardization has been shown to be very efficient as far as technical performance and postoperatory results are concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Mosienko P, Seckinger DL: Long-term histological study of skin after chemical face peeling. Plast Reconst Surg53:522, 1974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Connell BF: Cervical lift: surgical correction of fat contour problems combined with full-width platysma muscle flaps. Aesth Plast Surg1:355–362, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guerrero-Santos J, Espaillat L, Morales F: Muscular lift in cervical rhytidoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg56:127, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  4. Litton C: Chemical face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg29:371, 1962

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Millard DR Jr, Garst WP, Beck RL, Thompson ID: Submental and submandibular lipectomy in conjunction with face life in the male or female. Plast Reconstr Surg49:385, 1972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitz V, Peyronie M: The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg58:80, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mustarde JC: Problems and pitfalls in blepharoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg1:349–354, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pina DP: Blefaroplastia inferior com o tratamento cutâneo e muscular em planos cirurgicos distintos. Presented at 12th Congr Bras Cir Plást, Abril 1975

  9. Pina DP: Rhytidoplasty: A personal approach (abstract). VIIIth Congr Int Soc Aesth Plast Surg, Madrid, Spain, 1985

  10. Skoog T: Plastic surgery—new methods and refinements. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spira M, Gerow FJ, Hardy SB: Cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg40:551, 1967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pompeo de Pina, D. Diagnosis and technical refinements in rhytidectomy: A personal approach. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 11, 7–14 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575476

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575476

Key words

Navigation