Skip to main content
Log in

Sense-making—A case study using the movieJurassic park

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this ecological age, communicating information on environmental issues is extremely important. Yet, problems exist in communication models where knowledge is seen as absolute and the individual envisioned as an empty receptacle. What happens when a person assimilates knowledge? How does this knowledge relate to a person's view of the world (reality)? This paper is a brief introduction to Sense-Making, an alternative methodology which allows an insight into a person's perception of reality. Interviews were conducted with science teachers following a viewing ofJurassic Park to investigate the relationship of the movie to their ontological view of science, society and self. The Sense-Making methodology may be very beneficial in helping educators and communicators to understand the assimilation of knowledge by people and consequently the development of future communication models on scientific and environmental issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartlett, Susan. 1993. Are Scientists the New Screen Villains? Messages from the Media. Scientists' Institute for Public Information.SIPIscope. Winter 1993–94, pp. 4–5.

  • Brothers, Christine C., Fortner, Rosanne W., and Mayer, Victor J. (1991). The Impact of Television News on Public Environmental Knowledge.Journal of Environmental Education. 22(4): 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrill, James G. (1992). Understanding Environmental Advocacy: Interdisciplinary Research and the Role of Cognition.Journal of Environmental Education. 24(1): 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Carol. (1993). Are Scientists the New Screen Villains? Messages from the Media. Scientists' Institute for Public Information.SIPIscope. Winter 1993–94. pp. 4–5.

  • deHaven-Smith, L. (199). Environmental belief systems: Public opinion on land use regulation in Florida.Environment and Behavior. 20: 176–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B. (1992). From the Mind's Eye of the User: the Sense-making Qualitative-Quantitative Methodology. In Glazier, Jack D., and Powell, Ronald R. (Eds.),Qualitative Research in Information Management, Libraries, Unlimited, Inc., Englewood, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B., and Ghosh, Sanjukta. (1991).Rambo Movie Genre Audience Reception Study Through OSU Class.

  • Dervin, B. (1989). Audience as Listener and Learner, Teacher and Confidante. The Sense-Making Approach. In Rice, Ronald, and Atkins Charles (Eds.),Public Communication Campaigns. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, pp. 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B. (1984). Research for Responsive Media Design: An Example. Paper presented to the Mass Communication Division International Communication Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, May 1984.

  • Dervin, B. (1983a). An Overview of Sense-Making Research: Concepts, Methods, and Results to date. International Communication Association Annual Meeting, Dallas. (Proceedings.) May 1983.

  • Dervin, B. (1983b). Information as a User Construct: The Relevance of Perceived Information Needs to Synthesis and Interpretation. In Ward, S. A. and Reed, L. J. (Eds.),Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for Synthesis and Interpretation. Philadelphia University Press, pp. 153–183.

  • Dervin, Brenda, Jacobson, Thomas L., and Nilan, Michael S. (1982). Measuring Aspects of Information Seeking: A Test of a Quantitative/Qualitative Methodology. In Burgoon, M. (Ed.),Communication Yearbook 6. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A. (1982).Risk and Culture. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., and Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results.Journal of Environmental Education. 9: 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, W., and Rosenberg, W. (1987). Media Exposure and Beliefs about Science and Technology.Communication Research. 14(2): 164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellhorn, J. G. (1991). The First Annual International Environmental Film Festival: A viewer's perspective.Journal of Environmental Education. 22(3): 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, T. (1992). Hollywood goes green.Audubon. 94(2): 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signoreilli, N. (1981). Scientists on the TV Screen.Society. 18(4): 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. (1993). Dinomania. Scientists' Institute for Public Information.SIPIscopre. Winter 1993–94. pp. 6–14.

  • Hepburn, M. A., and Hepburn, L. R. (1985). Case study of the acid rain controversy: Political propaganda or environmental education?Journal of Environmental Education. 16(4): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, Donald W., and Gifford, Robert. (1991). Fear Appeals, Individual Differences and Environmental Concern.Journal of Environmental Education. 23(1): 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955).A theory of personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1988).The Long Interview. Sage Publication, Newbury Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, Joseph D. (1980). Meaningful Reception Learning as a basis for Rational Thinking. In Lawson, A. E. (Ed.),1980 AETS Yearbook: The Psychology of Teaching for Thinking and Creativity. ERIC, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelschlaeger, M. (1991).The Idea of Wilderness. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostman, R. E. (1976). Professional Evaluations of Drug Abuse Education Films. In Ostman, R. E. (Ed.),Communication Research and Drug Education. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostman, Ronald Elroy, and Parker, Jill L. (1986). A Public's Environmental Information Sources and Evaluations of Mass Media.Journal of Environmental Education. 18(2): 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, A. (1989). The Exploration of Meaning in Environmental Education.Journal of Environmental Education. 21(1): 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. C., Lee-Sammons, L., Steger, M. A. E., and Lovrich, N. P., Jr. (1990). Media reliance and public images of environmental politics in Ontario and Michigan.Journalism Quarterly. 67(4): 838–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirages, D. C. (1977).The Sustainable Society. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scientist's Institute for Public Information (SIPI). (1989). Report from the cutting edge.SIPIscope, 17(2): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Lucy. (1993). It Made Science ... Exciting and Fun. Scientists' Institute for Public Information.SIPIscope. Winter 1993–94. pp. 11.

  • Stevenson, R. B. (1993). Becoming compatible: Curriculum and environmental thought.Journal of Environmental Education. 24(2): 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1993).Doing Critical Ethnography. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster's New World Compact School and Office Dictionary. 1989. p. 273.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, T.P. Sense-making—A case study using the movieJurassic park . J Sci Educ Technol 5, 77–86 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575473

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575473

Key Words

Navigation