Skip to main content
Log in

Insertion of mammary gel prosthesis with negative pressure

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a maneuver in which negative pressure is used to ease the insertion of gel prosthesis in augmentation mammoplasty and, therefore, reduce the risk of prosthetic rupture during surgery. A polyvinyl urethral catheter, inserted in the areolar incision, is attached to the surgery room vacuum pump. The negative pressure thus created allows the prosthesis to be inserted safely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cronin TD, Gerow FJ: Augmentation mammoplasty: A new “natural feel” prosthesis.In: Proceedings of the IIIrd International Congress of Plastic Surgery, Washington, DC. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, No. 66. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1963, pp. 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cronin TD, Greenberg RL: Our experiences with the Silastic gel breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg46:1, 1970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dufourmentel L: L'incision aréolaire dans la chirurgie du sein. Bull Mem Soc Chir Paris20:9, 1928

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jones FR, Tauras AP: A periareolar incision for augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg51:641, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pitanguy I: Transareolar incision for gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg38:414, 1966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Webster JP: Mastectomy for gynecomastia through a semi-circular intra-areolar incision. Ann Surg124:557, 1946

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ronan Horta de Almeida, A. Insertion of mammary gel prosthesis with negative pressure. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 4, 339–341 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575236

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575236

Key words

Navigation