Skip to main content
Log in

A preliminary study of hostility: The hostility ratio

  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The hostility ratio was consistently depressed or decreased by the presence of a male authority figure. Differences in the amount of decrease suggest that this was due more to personality and attitude than to position in the administrative hierarchy. A subsequent sequent study of positions is needed to clarify such an impression further. It is to be noted that female authority figures were not considered in relation to male authority figures.

The hostility ratio was significantly lower for nonclinical personnel than for clinical personnel employed in the same hospital. The possibility is seen that this may be due to less association with patients and hostile events, as well as to the factor of smaller department size and the proximity of these nonclinical employees to supervision.

A consistently present female-male differential is noted as a relative frequency of the ratio. The question is raised of whether this is due to male participation in a clinical, female type of occupation, or whether it may be the reflection of a real difference in the general population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Bennis, W. F.: Leadership theory and administrative behavior—the problem of authority. Admin. Sci. Quart., 4:159, December 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burling, T.; Lentz, E. M., and Wilson, R. N.: The Give and Take in Hospitals. Putnam. New York. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, Arnold H.; Durkee, Ann, and Baer, Marc B.: The measurement of hostility in clinical situations. J. Abnor. and Soc. Psychol., 52:1, 84–86, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, I. L. W., and Osmond, H.: Permissive and authoritarian: two misleading words. Ment. Hosp., 10:35, April 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, J. G. N., and Cushing, Mary McK: A concept of the genesis of hostility. Bull. Menninger Clin., 13:3, 94–99, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A.: Authority structure and organizational effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart., 3:43, June 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel, O.: The Psycho-Analytic Theory of Neurosis. Norton. New York. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, E.: Ego-strengthening aspects of hostility. Am. J. Orthopsychiat., 26:1, 179–187, 1956.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, Louis: Handbook of Hospital Psychiatry. International Universities Press. New York. 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, S.: Measurement of hostility: a pilot study. J. Clin. Psychol., 10:3, 280–282, 1954.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Archer, R.H. A preliminary study of hostility: The hostility ratio. Psych Quar 35, 562–574 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01573624

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01573624

Keywords

Navigation