Skip to main content
Log in

Pyruvate as a substrate for growth and methanogenesis forMethanosarcina barkeri

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methanosarcina barkeri strains (227, MS, and UBS) were tested for their ability to utilize pyruvate for growth and methanogenesis. All three strains grown on methanol required 4–5 weeks of adaptation for growth on pyruvate, whereas they required only 2–3 weeks of adaptation for growth on acetate. The adapted cells had a lag of 3–4 days for growth on acetate and 5–10 days for growth on pyruvate. Equimolar amounts of methane were produced from acetate, whereas 0.6–0.7 mol of methane was produced per mol of pyruvate. The optimal concentration of pyruvate for growth and methanogenesis for all three strains was 100 mM, and doubling times were in the range of 135–170 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Asceti DJ, Ferry JG (1988) Purification and characterization of acetate kinase from acetate-grownMethanosarcina thermophila. Evidence for regulation of synthesis. J Biol Chem 263:15444–15448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balch WE, Wolfe RS (1976) New approach to the cultivation of methanogenic bacteria: 2-mercaptoethane sulfonic acid (HS CoM)-dependent growth ofMethanobacterium ruminantium in a pressurized atmosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 32:781–791

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blaylock BA (1968) Cobamide-dependent methanol-cyanocob(I)alamin methyltransferase ofMethanosarcina barkeri. Arch Biochem Biophys 124:314–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryant MP, Boone DR (1987) Emended description of strain MST (DSM 800T), the type strain ofMethanosarcina barkeri. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:169–170

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daniels L, Belay N, Rajagopal BS (1986) Assimilatory reduction of sulfate and sulfite by methanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:703–709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferry JG (1992) Methane from acetate. J Bacteriol 174:5489–5495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchs G, Stupperich E (1982) Autotrophic CO2 fixation pathway inMethanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg 1Abt Orig C3:227–282

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gottschalk G (1986) Bacterial metabolism, 2nd ed, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jetten MSM, Stams AJM, Zehnder AJB (1992) Methanogenesis from acetate: a comparison of the acetate metabolism inMethanothrix soehngenii andMethanosarcina spp. FEMS Microbiol Rev 88:181–198

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kenealy WR, Zeikus JG (1982) One-carbon metabolism in methanogens: evidence for synthesis of a two-carbon cellular intermediate and unification of catabolism and anabolism inMethanosarcina barkeri. J Bacteriol 151:932–941

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krzycki JA, Wolkin RH, Zeikus JG (1982) Comparison of unitrophic and mixotrophic substrate metabolism by an acetateadapted strain ofMethanosarcina barkeri. J Bacteriol 149:247–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundie LL Jr, Ferry JG (1989) Activation of acetate byMethanosarcina thermophila. J Biol Chem 264:18392–18396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mah RA, Smith MR, Baresi L (1978) Studies on acetatefermenting strain ofMethanosarcina. Appl Environ Microbiol 35:1174–1184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Markwell MAK, Haas SM, Beiber LL, Tolbert NE (1978) A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Anal Biochem 87:206–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oremland RS (1988) Biogeochemistry of methanogenic bacteria. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp 641–705

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sparling R, Daniels L (1987) The specificity of growth inhibition of methanogenic bacteria by bromoethanesulfonate. Can J Microbiol 33:1132–1136

    Google Scholar 

  17. Terlesky KC, Nelson MJK, Ferry JG (1986) Isolation of an enzyme complex with carbon monoxide dehydrogenase activity containing corrinoid and nickel from acetate-grownMethanosarcina thermophila. J Bacteriol 168:1053–1058

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Andel JG, Breure AM (1984) Anaerobic waste treatment. Trends Biotechnol 2:16–20

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vogels GD, Keltjens JT, Van Der Drift C (1988) Biochemistry of methane production. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp 707–770

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weimer PJ, Zeikus JG (1978a) One-carbon metabolism in methanogenic bacteria: cellular characterization and growth ofMethanosarcina barkeri. Arch Microbiol 119:49–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weimer PJ, Zeikus JG (1978b) Acetate metabolism inMethanosarcina barkeri. Arch Microbiol 119:175–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolin EA, Wolin MJ, Wolfe RS (1963) Formation of methane by bacterial extracts. J Biol Chem 238:2882–2886

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang ST, Okos MR (1987) Kinetic study and mathematical modeling of methanogenesis of acetate using pure cultures of methanogens. Biotechnol Bioeng 30:661–667

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zeikus JG, Winfrey MR (1976) Temperature limitation of methanogenesis in aquatic sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 31:99–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajagopal, B.S., LeGall, J. Pyruvate as a substrate for growth and methanogenesis forMethanosarcina barkeri . Current Microbiology 28, 307–311 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01573211

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01573211

Keywords

Navigation