Abstract
Left-right asymmetries in atomic transitions, depending upon the nuclear spin, could be a source of information on the neutral hadronic axial current. We show that the relevant electroweak parameter can be extracted from experiment by measuring hyperfine component ratios which do not involve the knowledge of the atomic wave function. In the standard electroweak model, the parity violating electron-nucleus interaction associated with the hadronic axial neutral current is accidently suppressed and, as a consequence, dominated by the electron interaction with the nuclear anapole moment, which describes the effect of the parity violating nuclear forces on the nucleus electromagnetic current. One of our objectives was to identify the various physical mechanisms which determine the size of the nuclear anapole moments. As an important step, we have established a simple relation between the anapole moment and the nuclear spin magnetization. From this relation it follows that the computation of the anapole moment can be reduced to that of one-body operators. The basic tool is a unitary transformationW which eliminates the one-body parity violating potential from the nuclear hamiltonian. It generalizes, to more realistic situations, a procedure used by F.C. Michel in the case of constant nuclear density. The fact that the transformationW does not commute with the residual spin-dependent nucleon-nucleon interaction can be accounted for — within some approximation — by a renormalization of the effective coupling constants which appear in the one-body reduction of the two-body parity violating nucleon-nucleon interaction induced by meson exchange. A particular attention was paid to nuclear correlation effects. They are treated semi-empirically in the independent pair approximation. The nuclear anapole moments of85Rb,133Cs, and209Bi have been evaluated for three sets of parity violating meson-nucleon coupling constants, taking into account configuration mixing effects in a semi-empirical way. We suggest a possible strategy to disentangle the axial neutral current from the anapole moment contribution. It requires experiments, accurate to few tenths of a percent, performed on several heavy nuclei. The results should be collected in a two-dimensional plot involving a suitably chosen set of variables (X, Y). In an ideal situation — small theoretical uncertainties —the points corresponding to various nuclei should fall on a straight line which crosses the lineX=0 at a point the ordinate of which is the sought for axial coupling constant.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V.V. Flambaum, I.B. Khriplovich: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 79 (1980) 1656 [JETP 52 (1980) 835]; V.V. Flambaum, I.B. Khriplovich, O.P. Sushkov: Phys. Lett. B146 (1984) 367; V.V. Flambaum: Proc. Int. Symp. Modern Developments in Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk (1987) 557–573, Singapore: World Scientific 1987
Ya. B. Zeldovich: Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz 33 (1957) 1531, [JETP 6 (1957) 1184]
M.A. Bouchiat, J. Guéna, L. Hunter, L. Pottier: Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 358; B121 (1983) 456; B134 (1984) 463; J. Physique 46 (1985) 1987; 47 (1986) 1175; 47 (1986) 1709
S.L. Gilbert, M.C. Noecker, R.N. Watts, C.E. Wieman: Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2680; S.L. Gilbert, C.E. Wieman: Phys. Rev. A34 (1986) 792
M.C. Noecker, B.P. Masterson, C.E. Wieman: Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 310
M.A. Bouchiat, C. Bouchiat: J. Physique 35 (1974) 899
C.A. Piketty: Weak and electromagnetic interactions in nuclei, Proc. Int. Symp. Heidelberg (1986) 603, H.V. Klapdor (ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1986; and 88 Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, Proc. XXIII-rd Rencontre de Moriond, (1988) 121, J. Tran Thanh Van (ed.), Gif-sur-Yvette and Singapore Editions Frontières 1988
C. Bouchiat, C.A. Piketty, D. Pignon: Nucl. Phys. B 221 (1983) 68, Erratum: Nucl. Phys. B282 (1987) 745; C. Bouchiat, C.A. Piketty: Phys. Lett. B128 (1983) 73; Europhys. Lett. 2 (1986) 511
P.A. Frantsukov, I.B. Khriplovich: Z. Phys. D7 (1988) 297
F.C. Michel: Phys. Rev. B133 (1964) 329
M.G. Mayer, J.H.D. Jensen: Elementary theory of nuclear shell structure, 2nd ed, (1957) 75–81, New York: Wiley 1957
A. Bohr, B.R. Mottelson: Nuclear structure Vol. I (1969) 238, New York: W.A. Benjamin 1969
E.G. Adelberger, W.C. Haxton: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 35 (1985) 501
M. Lacombe et al.: Phys. Rev. C21 (1980) 861
A. de Shalit, H. Feshbach: Theoretical nuclear physics, Vol. I: Nuclear structure (1974) 173, New York: Wiley 1974
G.A. Miller, J.E. Spencer: Ann. Phys. 100 (1976) 562
B. Desplanques, J.F. Donoghue, B.R. Holstein: Ann. Phys. 124 (1980) 449
E.G. Adelberger: Weak and electromagnetic interactions in nuclei, Proc. Symp. Heidelberg (1986) 593, H.V. Klapdor (ed.), Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1986
V.J. Zeps et al.: Proc. of the Intersections between Particle and Nuclear Physics, Rockport (1988) 176, G.M. Bunce (ed); V.J. Zeps: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington (1989), unpublished
J. Ashman et al. EMC Coll.: Phys. Lett. B206 (1988) 364
B.A. Campbell, J. Ellis, R.A. Flores: Phys. Lett. B225 (1989) 419
G.E. Brown: Nuclear moments and nuclear structure, Proc. Int. Conf. Osaka, Japan (1972), Suppl. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 34 (1973)
W.C. Haxton, E.M. Henley, M.J. Musolf: Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 949
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Unité Propre du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, associée à l'Ecole Normale Supérieure et à l'Université de Paris Sud
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bouchiat, C., Piketty, C.A. Nuclear spin dependent atomic parity violation, nuclear anapole moments and the hadronic axial neutral current. Z. Phys. C - Particles and Fields 49, 91–107 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570800
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570800