Abstract
The advantages of non-prefixed marking for breast reduction are discussed in this paper. The authors use a curved incision modification of the Pitanguy technique, stressing the value of changing the demarcation depending on the skin-gland relationship of each patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cardoso de Castro C.: Mammaplasty with curved incisions. Plast. Reconstr Surg57:596, 1976
Cardoso de Castro C.: Late results after reduction mammaplasty with curved incisions. Plast Reconstr Surg61:862, 1978
Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM: Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg59:500, 1977
McKissock PK: Reduction mammaplasty with a vertical dermal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg49:245, 1972.
Pitanguy I: Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg57:596, 1976
Pontes R. Reduction mammaplasty—Variations I and II. Ann Plast Surg6:437, 1981
Robins TH: A reduction mammaplasty with the areola-nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg59:64, 1977
Skoog T: A technique of breast reduction. Transposition of the nipple on a cutaneous vascular pedicle. Acta Chir Scand12:453, 1963
Strombeck JO: Mammaplasty: Report of a new technique based on the two-pedicle procedure. Br J Plast Surg13:79, 1960
Weiner DL, Aiache AE, Silver L, Tittiranonta T: A single dermal pedicle for nipple transposition in subcutaneous mastectomy, reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg51:115, 1973
Wise RJ: A preliminary report on a method of planning the mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg17:367, 1956
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Castro, C.C., Coelho, R.F.S. & Cintra, H.P.L. The value of non-prefixed marking in reduction mammoplasty. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 8, 237–241 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570710
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570710