Skip to main content
Log in

Rhinoplasty update: Preoperative evaluation of 4,040 cases

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 4,040 cases of cosmetic rhinoplasty surgery was evaluated in terms of sex distribution, age, marital status, and motivating factors. There was a male to female ratio of 1∶15.9. Of the 1,880 patients operated on between 1975 and 1980, there were 40.2% females and 33.3% males over the age of 24 years. This is an increase over a previous patient group of 2,160 patients treated between 1964 and 1974, in which older women comprised 26.8% and older men 24% of those treated. The proportion of married patients has increased since 1975, with 29.1% of the women married and 11.4% of the men (versus 18.6% and 4.8%, respectively, for the earlier period). Motivating factors included the patient's own desire for a change, external influences such as advice from family or friends, and observation of someone who had undergone rhinoplasty successfully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker WY, Smith LH: Facial disfigurement and personality. JAMA112:301, 1939

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown JB, McDowell F: Plastic Surgery of the Nose. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1951, pp 27–30

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edgerton MT, Knorr NJ: Motivational patterns of patients seeking cosmetic (aesthetic) surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg48:551, 1971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill G, Siver AG: Psychodynamic and esthetic motivations for plastic surgery. Psychosom Med12:345, 1950

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobson WE, Edgerton MT, Meyer E, Cantor A, Slaughter R: Psychiatric evaluation of the male patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg26:356, 1960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobson WE, Meyer E, Edgerton MT: Psychiatric contributions to the clinical management of plastic surgery patients. Postgrad Med29:513, 1961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobson WE, Meyer E, Edgerton MT, Cantor A, Slaughter R: Screening of rhinoplasty patients from the psychologic point of view. Plast Reconstr Surg28:279, 1961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Knorr NJ, Edgerton MT, Hoopes JE: The “insatiable” cosmetic surgery patient. Plast Reconstr Surg40:285, 1967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Knorr NJ, Hoopes JE, Edgerton MT: Psychiatricsurgical approach to adolescent disturbance in selfimage. Plast Reconstr Surg41:248, 1968

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Linn L, Goldman IB: Psychiatric observations concerning rhinoplasty. Psychosom Med11:307, 1949

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MacGregor FC, Schaffner B: Screening patients for nasal plastic operations. Some sociologic and psychiatric considerations. Psychosom Med12:277, 1950

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer E, Jacobson WE, Edgerton MT, Carter A: Motivational patterns in patients seeking elective plastic surgery. I. Women who seek rhinoplasty. Psychosom Med22:193, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rees TD: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1980, pp 24–36

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shulman J: Rhinoplasty: Preoperative evaluation of 2160 cases. Transactions of the Sixth International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Paris, 24–29 August 1975. Paris: Edition D Marchac, 1976, pp 476–478

    Google Scholar 

  15. Surgical-psychiatric study of patients seeking plastic cosmetic surgery: ninety-eight consecutive patients with minimal deformity. Br J Plast Surg13:136, 1961

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shulman, J., Westreich, M. Rhinoplasty update: Preoperative evaluation of 4,040 cases. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 7, 227–232 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570665

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570665

Key words

Navigation