Skip to main content

The use and abuse of external incisions in rhinoplasties

Abstract

The author emphasizes his basic opposition to the use of external incisions in surgical rhinoplasty with only a few minor exceptions. External incisions are justifiable in only a limited number of cases, and when they are published these cases should be exceptional indeed and not suggested as an alternative technique or as an innovation to be used on a routine basis. The endonasal approach should be used in the vast majority of aesthetic rhinoplasties with only a few exceptions mentioned here.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Rogers BO: John Orlando Roe-not Jacques Joseph —The Father of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg10:63, 1986

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benito Vilar-Sancho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vilar-Sancho, B. The use and abuse of external incisions in rhinoplasties. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 13, 63–64 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570328

Download citation

Key words

  • Rhinoplasty, aesthetic
  • Endonasal surgery
  • External incisions, drawbacks