The use and abuse of external incisions in rhinoplasties

Abstract

The author emphasizes his basic opposition to the use of external incisions in surgical rhinoplasty with only a few minor exceptions. External incisions are justifiable in only a limited number of cases, and when they are published these cases should be exceptional indeed and not suggested as an alternative technique or as an innovation to be used on a routine basis. The endonasal approach should be used in the vast majority of aesthetic rhinoplasties with only a few exceptions mentioned here.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Rogers BO: John Orlando Roe-not Jacques Joseph —The Father of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg10:63, 1986

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benito Vilar-Sancho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vilar-Sancho, B. The use and abuse of external incisions in rhinoplasties. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 13, 63–64 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570328

Download citation

Key words

  • Rhinoplasty, aesthetic
  • Endonasal surgery
  • External incisions, drawbacks