Conclusions
The advantages of this modified Ragnell procedure are that a conical breast is formed, the submammary scar is short and inconspicuous, and the operation is safe.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carlson, L. and Tershakowec, M.G.: A variation of the Biesenberger technique of reduction mammoplasty, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 55:653, 1975.
Conway, H. and Smith, J.: Breast plasticsurgery: reduction mammoplasty, mastopexy, augmentation mammoplasty, and mammary construction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 21:8, 1958.
Ragnell, A.: Breast reduction and lactation, Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1:99, 1948.
Ragnell, A.: Operative correction of hypertrophy and ptosis of the female breast, Acta. Chir. Scand. (Suppl. 113) 94:00, 1946.
Stark, R.B., In Peterson, R.A. (ed.): Aesthetic Surgery of the Breast, C.V. Mosby, St. Louis (in press).
Strombeck, J.O.: Breast reconstruction; reduction mammoplasty, In Gibson, T.:Modern Trends in Plastic Surgery, Butterworths, Washington, 1964, p. 237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stark, R.B. A procedure for mammary reduction and mastopexy: Summary of 100 personally performed operations. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 1, 145–148 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570246
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570246