Skip to main content
Log in

A procedure for mammary reduction and mastopexy: Summary of 100 personally performed operations

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

The advantages of this modified Ragnell procedure are that a conical breast is formed, the submammary scar is short and inconspicuous, and the operation is safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlson, L. and Tershakowec, M.G.: A variation of the Biesenberger technique of reduction mammoplasty, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 55:653, 1975.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Conway, H. and Smith, J.: Breast plasticsurgery: reduction mammoplasty, mastopexy, augmentation mammoplasty, and mammary construction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 21:8, 1958.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ragnell, A.: Breast reduction and lactation, Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1:99, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ragnell, A.: Operative correction of hypertrophy and ptosis of the female breast, Acta. Chir. Scand. (Suppl. 113) 94:00, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stark, R.B., In Peterson, R.A. (ed.): Aesthetic Surgery of the Breast, C.V. Mosby, St. Louis (in press).

  6. Strombeck, J.O.: Breast reconstruction; reduction mammoplasty, In Gibson, T.:Modern Trends in Plastic Surgery, Butterworths, Washington, 1964, p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stark, R.B. A procedure for mammary reduction and mastopexy: Summary of 100 personally performed operations. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 1, 145–148 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570246

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570246

Keywords

Navigation