Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of European and US biological indicators for ethylene oxide sterilization

  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology

Summary

Biological indicators (BIs) are used to monitor ethylene oxide (EO) gas sterilization processes for medical devices. Several European and United States BIs for EO sterilization were evaluated for resistance according to both United States Pharmacopeia (USP) XXI and United Kingdom's (UK) tests for D-values. US BIs areB. subtilis var. niger spores on paper strips or disc carriers while European BIs use aluminum strips, quartz sand, or cotton yarn. Numerous BIs per run and runs per lot, as well as 2–3 different lots of BIs from each manufacturer, were examined. Both British and US BIs met their respective label claims for rates of inactivation when tested against British and USP EO test parameters, respectively. However, Danish BIs, on cotton yarn or quartz sand, were not inactivated following USP specifications during the exposure dwell times tested (600 mg L−1 EO, 54°C, 60% RH, 0–110 min). The Danish BIs will require further testing in order for us to determine if theirB. subtilis spores are unusually resistant to EO or if the spore carrier substrates protect the spores from the sterilizing gas. In conclusion, the British and American BIs for EO sterilization are equivalent in resistance despite differences in carrier substrate, recovery conditions, calculation methods for D-values, and the labeled sterilization conditions for use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. In: Official Methods of Analysis, 14th edn, Sect. 46.013(m), p. 942, Arlington, VA.

  2. Caputo, R.A. and T.E. Odlaug. 1983. Sterilization with ethylene oxide and other gases. In: Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation (Block, S.S., ed.), Ch. 2, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia PA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dadd, A.H. and G.M. Daley. 1990. Resistance of microorganisms to inactivation by gaseous ethylene oxide. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 49: 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS). 1985. Specification for biological monitors for the control of ethylene oxide sterilization. Specification No. TSS/S/330.012, London, UK.

  5. Glasstone, S. and D. Lewis. 1960. Kinetics of chemical reactions. In: Elements of Physical Chemistry, pp. 601–608, D. Van Nostrand Company, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pflug, I.J. 1982. Analysis of survival data. In: Introductory Course in the Microbiology and Engineering of Sterilization Processes, 5th edn, pp. 7.1–7.44, Environmental Sterilization Laboratory, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  7. United States Pharmacopeia. 1985. Biological indicators for ethylene oxide sterilization, paper strip, pp. 119–120, 21st Rev., Mack Printing Company, Easton, PA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demitrius, C.A., Duran, A.P., Chamberlain, V.C. et al. Comparison of European and US biological indicators for ethylene oxide sterilization. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 12, 399–402 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569671

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569671

Key words

Navigation