Skip to main content
Log in

Selection in yeast II: The fitness distribution of new mutations inSaccharomyces cerevisiae and its use in a computer simulation

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology

Summary

The fitness distribution of new mutations inSaccharomyces cerevisiae strain Montrachet was determined for cells on agar irradiated for four periods of time with ultraviolet light. The fitness distributions were obtained by converting a large number of colony diameters into relative fitnesses. The distributions were then used to perform a computer simulation with the purpose of predicting the potential of a stock culture to increase in general fitness through selection, given a frequency and magnitude of mutations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aieba, S., M. Shoda and M. Nagatani. 1968. Kinetics of production inhibition in alcohol fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 10: 845–864.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bazua, C.D. and C.R. Wilke. 1975. Ethanol effects on the kinetics of a continuous fermentation withS. cerevisiae. Chem. Cong. NA (Mexico) 1: 28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bodmer, W.F. and L.L. Cavalli-Sforza. 1972. Variation in fitness and molecular evolution. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Le Cam, L.M., J. Neyman and E.L. Scott, eds.), University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boulton, R. 1980. The prediction of fermentation behavior by a kinetic model. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 31: 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cottrell, S.F. 1981. Mitochondrial DNA synthesis in synchronous cultures of the yeast,Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp. Cell Res. 132: 89–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cottrell, S.F. and C.J. Avers. 1971. Mitochondrial activities in synchronous cultures of Baker's Yeast. In: Autonomy and Bioenergetics of Mitochondria and Chloroplasts (Boardman, N.K., A.W. Linnane and R.M. Smillie, eds.), North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crow, J.W. 1972. Darwinian and non-Darwinian evolution. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Le Cam, L. M., J. Neyman and E.L. Scott, eds.), University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holzberg, I., R.K. Finn and K.H. Steinkraus. 1967. A kinetic study of the alcohol fermentation of grape juice. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 9: 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  9. King, J.K. 1972. The role of mutation in evolution. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Le Cam, L.M., J. Neyman and E.L. Scott, eds.), University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Masatoshi, N. 1975. Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution. North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meiering, A.G., R.E. Subden and C.L. Penn 1982. Microprozessorsteuerung der Äthanolgärung. Grund. C. Landtechnik. (Verein Deut. Ing.) 32: 124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mota, M., P. Strehaiano and G. Goma. 1984. Studies on conjugate effects of substrate (glucose) and product (ethanol) on cell kinetics during fermentation on different yeast strains. J. Inst. Brew. 90: 359–362.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scopes, A.W. and D.H. Williamson. 1964. The growth and oxygen uptake of synchronously dividing cultures ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp. Cell Res. 35: 361–371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Snow R. 1979. Toward genetic improvement of wine yeast. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 30(1): 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Subden, R.E. 1983. Wine yeasts. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 24: 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Subden, R.E., R.L. Charlebois and C.K. Carey. 1987. Selection in yeast. I. Assessing genetic stability and relative fitness of commercial yeasts. J. Ind. Microbiol. 2: 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Timofeef-Ressovsky, N.W. 1940. Mutations and geographic variation. In: The New Systematics (Huxley, J., ed.), Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wickerham, L.J. 1951. Taxonomy of yeasts. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. No. 1029.

  19. Williamson, D.H. and A.W. Scopes. 1960. The behaviour of nucleic acids in synchronously dividing cultures ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp. Cell Res. 20: 338–349.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Williamson, D.H. and A.W. Scopes. 1961. The distribution of nucleic acids and protein between different sized yeast cells. Exp. Cell Res. 24: 151–153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Williamson, D.H. and A.W. Scopes. 1962. A rapid method for synchronizing division in the yeast,Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 193: 256–257.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charlebois, R.L., Subden, R.E. & Carey, K. Selection in yeast II: The fitness distribution of new mutations inSaccharomyces cerevisiae and its use in a computer simulation. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 2, 167–174 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569424

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569424

Key words

Navigation