Abstract
On the assumption that colleges need a theory which specifies what they should be trying to do and how they should do it, two popular theories of this sort are described. “Bundle of knowledge” theory rests on the idea that education should impart pieces of knowledge which can be assessed by behavioral criteria with methods based on established principles of learning. “Developmental stage theory” holds that education should help students move through a sequence of general stages towards maturity. A third theory called “component theory”, is then sketched, in which the idea of general stages is disputed and the idea of component abilities of intellectual processes substituted. This theory has implications which are similar to those of stage theory if it is combined with certain moral assumptions about the goals of college education, namely that its purpose is to help students form and pursue life plans which are both rational and just.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, J. (1973). “Semantic Components and Conceptual Development.”Cognition, 2: 299–317.
Bijou, S. W. (1970). “What Psychology Has to Offer Education-Now.”Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3: 65–70.
Bok, D. (1972) “What Role For the College?” Speech welcoming the Harvard class of 1976. Reprinted inHarvard Today (October).
Brown, R. W. (1965).Social Psychology. New York: The Free Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1966).Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dubin, R. and Taveggia, T. C. (1968).The Teaching-Learning Paradox. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1971). “Stage-Related Properties of Cognitive Development.”Cognitive Psychology, 2: 421–450.
Frankena, W. K. (1965). “Introduction.” In: W. K. Frankena (ed.)Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.
Freud, A. (1937).The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. London: Hogarth Press.
Furby, L. (1972). “Cumulative Learning and Cognitive Development.”Human Development 15: 265–286
Gagné, R. M. (1968). “Contributions of Learning to Human Development”,Psychological Review, 75: 177–191.
Kohlberg, L. (1971). “From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy And Get Away With It in the Study of Moral Development.” In: T. Mischel (ed.).Cognitive Development and Epistemology. New York: Academic Press.
Kohlberg, L. and Meyer, R. (1972). “Development as the Aim of Education.”Harvard Educational Review, 42 (November).
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E. and Pribram, K. H. (1960).Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart.
Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970).Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart.
Piaget, J. (1970). “Piaget's Theory”. In: P. H. Mussen (ed.),Charmichael's Manual of Child Psychology. New York: Wiley.
Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Silberman, C. J. (1970).Crisis in the Classroom: The Remaking of American Education. New York: Random House.
Thorndike, E. L. and Woodworth, R. S. (1901). “The Influence of Improvement in One Mental Function upon the Efficienty of Other Functions”.Psychological Review, 8: 247–261.
White, R. W. (1963). “Ego and Reality in Psychoanalytic Theory”.Psychological Issues 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baron, J. Some theories of college instruction. High Educ 4, 149–172 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569167
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569167