Skip to main content
Log in

Non-selective intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-selective intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed immediately before selective coronary and bypass angiography in 33 consecutive symptomatic patients 48± 30 months after coronary surgery, for the assessment of 75 coronary bypass grafts. Forty ml of non-ionic, low-iodine content contrast medium (iohexol) were injected into the ascending aorta at 10–20 ml/sec through a 7 or 8 F femoral pigtail catheter.

Electrocardiogram-triggered images were acquired on a Siemens Digitron II apparatus in multiple projections in 24 patients and in a single projection in 9 patients. The results of this technique were compared by two independent angiographers with those of selective graft angiography in the same patients. Patency was shown by DSA in 45 of 54 grafts confirmed to be open by selective angiography (sensitivity 83%). Of 21 occluded grafts, stumps were clearly visible at selective angiography in 18 and at DSA in 9 (sensitivity for graft stumns = 50%, p<0.01) Of 54 patent grafts with selective angiogranhy. the distal anastomosis could be visualized by DSA in 28 (52%), but the resolution was comparable to selective angiography in 20 grafts (37%) only. A non-significant difference in the sensitivity of DSA was observed between patent saphenous grafts to the left anterior descending coronary artery versus all other coronary arteries (95 vs 85%, respectively), while only 1 of 5 patent left internal mammary artery grafts to the left anterior descending coronary artery was visualized. In 16 of 50 grafts (32%) visualized in a second projection substantial additional diagnostic information was obtained. In conclusion, non-selective intra-arterial electrocardiogram-triggered DSA can visualize patent saphenous grafts with a high sensitivity and may be a useful screening tool for bypass grafts patency; false negatives, however, and poor visualization of distal anastomoses limit its routine clinical use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grondin CM: Late results of coronary artery grafting: Is there a flag on the field? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 87:161–6, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kempter A, Felix HR, Banzer D: Digitale Subtraktionsangiographie (DSA). Fortschr Roentgenstr 138: 137–9, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whithing JS: Assessing the coronary circulation by digital angiography: bypass graft and myocardial perfusion imaging. In: Heintzen PH, Brennecke R (eds) Digital imaging in cardiovascular radiology. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, 1983, 205–15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter G, Walton S, Hayward R, Santon RH, Emanuel R: Digital subtraction angiography: A screening procedure for patency of coronary artery bypass grafts (Abstract). Br Heart J 53: 105, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luska G, Hendrickx Ph, Kuhl A, Lichtlen P: Peripher venoese digitale Subtraktionsangiographie (DSA) zur Kontrolle von aortokoronaren Venenbypassgrafts (ACVB). ROFO 142, 1: 35–40, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levin DC: Digital subtraction angiography: Myths and reality. Radiology 151: 803, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Witte G, Jacobs G, Grabbe E, Roediger W, Kalmar P, Buecheler E: Arterielle DSA zur Darstellung des aortokoronaren Venenbypass (ACVB). Fortschr Roentgenstr 140, 3: 251–3, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hauenstein HK, Schlosser V, Roeren T, Kaufmann GW, Urbani B: Intraarterielle DSA zur Kontrolle aortokoronarer Gefaessbruecken — eine Alternative zur Coronarangiographie. Radiologe 25: 247–250, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayward R, Hunter GJS: Digital subtraction angiography in coronary artery bypass graft assessment: Clinical applicability. Br Heart J 54: 357–61, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis RP, Rittgers SE, Forester WF, Boudoulas H: A critical review of systolic time intervals. Circulation 56:146, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Levin DC, Schapiro RM, Boxt LM, Dunham L, Harrington DP, Ergun DL: Digital subtraction angiography: principles and pitfalls of image improvement techniques. AJR 143: 447–454, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrington DP, Boxt LM, Murray PD: Digital subtraction angiography: Overview of technical principles. AJR 139: 781–786, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Green GE: Rate of blood flow from the internal mammary arteries. Surgery 70, 6: 809–13, 1971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steffenino G, Meier B, Finci L, Doriot PA, Rutishauser W: Non-selective digital subtraction angiography of internal mammary arteries (Abstract). Giorn Ital Cardiologia 16 suppl 1: C150, 1986

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steffenino, G., Meier, B., Bopp, P. et al. Non-selective intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts. Int J Cardiac Imag 1, 209–215 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01568668

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01568668

Keywords

Navigation