We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Differential susceptibility to human serum byAeromonas spp.

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 91 strains ofAeromonas (A. hydrophila, A. sobria, andA. caviae) of clinical origin were challenged in vitro against pooled human serum. A majority of the isolates ofA. hydrophila andA. sobria were resistant to the bactericidal activity of human serum, as opposed to the more serum-sensitiveA. caviae species. This difference in serum sensitivity may potentially explain the greater association of the former species with bacteremia and invasive disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Carruthers, M. M., Kabat, W. M. 1981.Vibrio vulnificus (lactose-positive vibrio) andVibrio parahaemolyticus differ in their susceptibilities to human serum. Infection and Immunity32:964–966.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Daily, O. P., Joseph, S. W., Coolbaugh, J. C., Walker, R. I., Merrell, B. R., Rollins, D. M., Seidler, R. J., Colwell, R. R., Lissner, C. R. 1981. Association ofAeromonas sobria with human infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology13:769–777.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodwin, C. S., Harper, W. E. S., Stewart, J. K., Gracey, M., Burke, V., Robinson, J. 1983. EnterotoxigenicAeromonas hydrophila and diarrhoea in adults. Medical Journal of Australia1:25–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gracey, M., Burke, V., Robinson, J. 1982.Aeromonas-associated gastroenteritis. Lancet2:1304–1306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanson, P. G., Standridge, J., Jarrett, F., Maki, D. G. 1977. Freshwater wound infection due toAeromonas hydrophila. Journal of the American Medical Association238:1053–1054.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Janda, J. M., Raitano, M., Bottone, E. J. 1984. Biotyping ofAeromonas isolates as a correlate to delineating a species-associated disease spectrum. Journal of Clinical Microbiology19:44–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Joseph, S. W., Daily, O. P., Hunt, W. S., Seidler, R. J., Allen, D. A., Colwell, R. R. 1979.Aeromonas primary wound infection of a diver in polluted waters. Journal of Clinical Microbiology10:46–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ketover, B. P., Young, L. S., Armstrong, D. 1973. Septicemia due toAeromonas hydrophila: clinical and immunologic aspects. Journal of Infectious Diseases127:284–290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lynch, J. M., Tilson, W. R., Hodges, G. R., Barnes, W. G., Bopp, W. J., Watanake, I. 1981. NosocomialAeromonas hydrophila cellulitis and bacteremia in a nonimmunocompromised patients. Southern Medical Journal74:901–902.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moll, A., Cabello, F., Timmis, K. N. 1979. Rapid assay for the determination of bacterial resistance to the lethal activity of serum. FEMS Microbiology Letters6:273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Popoff, M., Véron, M. 1976. A taxonomic study of theAeromonas hydrophila-Aeromonas punctata group. Journal of General Microbiology94:11–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Popoff, M. Y., Coynault, C., Kiredjian, M., Lemelin, M. 1981. Polynucleotide sequence relatedness among motileAeromonas species. Current Microbiology5:109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scott, E. G., Russell, C. M., Noell, K. T., Sproul, A. E. 1978.Aeromonas hydrophila sepsis in a previously healthy man. Journal of the American Medical Association239:1742.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shotts, E. B., Gaines, J. L., Martin, C., Prestwood, A. K. 1972.Aeromonas-induced deaths among fish and reptiles in an eutrophic inland lake. Journal of the American Veterinary Association161:603–607.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sirinavin, S., Likitnukul, S., Lolekha, S. 1984.Aeromonas septicemia in infants and children. Pediatric Infectious Diseases3:122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tamplin, M. L., Specter, S., Rodrick, G. E., Friedman, H. 1983. Differential complement activation and susceptibility to human serum bactericidal action byVibrio species. Infection and Immunity42:1187–1190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, P. W. 1983. Bactericidal and bacteriolytic activity of serum against gram-negative bacteria. Microbiological Reviews47:46–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Von Graevenitz, A., Mensch, A. H. 1968. The genusAeromonas in human bacteriology: report of 30 cases and review of the literature. New England Journal of Medicine278:245–249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolff, R. L., Wiseman, S. L., Kitchens, C. S. 1980.Aeromonas hydrophila bacteremia in ambulatory immunocompromised hosts. American Journal of Medicine68:238–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janda, J.M., Brenden, R. & Bottone, E.J. Differential susceptibility to human serum byAeromonas spp.. Current Microbiology 11, 325–327 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01567700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01567700

Keywords

Navigation