Skip to main content
Log in

Orthopraxis

The cancelling of one parapraxis by another

  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Devereux, G.: The perception of motion in infancy. Bull. Menninger Clin., 29: 143–147, 1965.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. —: The cannibalistic impulses of parents. Psychoan. Forum, 1: 114–124. (See discussions of Coodley and of Ekstein, ibid., pp. 125, 127–128, and author's reply, ibid., pp. 129–130.) 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —: From Anxiety to Method. Mouton. Paris and The Hague. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. —: Fausse Non-Reconnaissance. Bull. Menninger Clin., 31: 69–78, 1967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. —: The realistic basis of fantasy J. Hillside Hosp., 17: 13–20, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freud, S.: The Subtleties of a Faulty Action. Standard Edition, vol. 22. Hogarth. London. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lenzen, V. F.: Causality in Natural Science. Thomas. Springfield, Ill. 1954. (A more detailed exposition of Lenzen's views on possibility is his “A Positivistic Theory of Possibility”—pp. 55–77 of a volume onPossibility in the series, University of California Publications in Philosophy.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devereux, G. Orthopraxis. Psych Quar 42, 726–737 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01564313

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01564313

Navigation