Skip to main content
Log in

The perspective of evil in understanding and treating child abuse

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper places the problem of child abuse in the perspective of evil. In so doing it calls into question the amoral assumptions of social science and human services. The current social science paradigm paradoxically dismisses evil as a real factor in the world, despite its concern for indisputably moral issues such as child abuse. The practical advantages of a perspective incorporating evil are several. Among them are a more realistic appreciation of the need for mechanisms of social control in preventing abuse, the role of confession and conversion, and the role of pastoral care as a support system for families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belsky, J., “Three Theoretical Models of Child Abuse: A Critical Review,”Child Abuse and Neglect: The International J., 1978,2, 37–49. Friedman, R., “Child Abuse: A Review of the Psychosocial Research.” In Herner and Co., eds.,Four Perspectives on the Status of Child Abuse and Neglect Research. Washington, D.C., National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, 1976. Garbarino, J., “The Human Ecology of Child Maltreatment: A Conceptual Model for Research,”J. Marriage and the Family, 1977,39, 721–736. Parke, R., and Collmer, C., “Child Abuse: An Interdisciplinary Analysis.” In Hetherington, E. M., ed.,Review of Child Development Research, Vol. 5. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pfohl, S., “The ‘Discovery’ of Child Abuse,”Social Problems, 1977,24, 310–323.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Newberger, E., and Bourne, R., “The Medicalization and Legalization of Child Abuse,”Am. J. Orthopsychiatry, 1978,48, 593–607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pelton, L., “The Myth of Classlessness in Child Abuse Cases,”loc. cit., 1978,48, 569–579.

  5. “Moral evil” is a more precise term. “Sin” is the most correct usage. Both presume the existence of free will. That, of course, is another difficult issue for social science.

  6. Lickona, T., ed.,Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shoben, E. J., “The Tragic Nature of Human Destiny,”Am. J. Orthopsychiatry, 1979,49, 564–570.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Google Scholar 

  9. Berkeley Planning Associates,Evaluation of Child Abuse and Neglect Projects, (1974–1977). Berkeley, California, Berkeley Planning Associates, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, D., “On the Conflict Between Biological and Social Evolution and Between Psychology and Moral Tradition,”Am. Psychologist, 1975,30, 1103–1126. Eysenck, H. J., “The Biology of Morality.” In Lickona,Moral Development and Behavior, op. cit. Wilson, E.,Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niebuhr, R.:Moral Man and Immoral Society. New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenfeld, A., and Newberger, E., “Compassion versus Control: Conceptual and Practical Pitfalls in the Broadened Definition of Child Abuse,”J. Am. Med. Assoc., 1977,237, 2086–2088.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Niebuhr, R.,The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness. New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1944, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. , p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Minuchin, S.; Rossman, B.; and Baker, L.,Psychosomatic Families: Anorexia Nervosa in Context. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. , p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Niebuhr, R.,The Nature and Destiny of Man, Vol. 1: Human Nature. New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  18. . p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Niebuhr,The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness,, p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  20. . Parke and Collmer,op. cit. “Child Abuse: An Interdisciplinary Analysis.” In Hetherington, E. M., ed.,Review of Child Development Research, Vol. 5. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1975. Polanksy, N., “Analysis of Research on Child Neglect: The Social Work Viewpoint.” In Herner and Co., eds.,Four Perspectives on the Status of Child Abuse and Neglect Research, op. cit. Washington, D.C., National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wooden, K.,Weeping in the Playtime of Others: The Plight of Incarcerated Children. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gil, D.,Violence Against Children: Physical Abuse in the United States. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1970 and 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zigler, E., “Controlling Child Abuse in America: An Effort Doomed to Failure.” In Bourne, R., and Newberger, E., eds.,Critical Perspectives on Child Abuse. Lexington, Mass., D. C. Heath and Co., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid. Zigler, E., “The Unmet Needs of America's Children,”Children Today, 1976, May–June, 39–42.

  25. Valusek, J.,People Are not for Hitting. Wichita, Kansas, John Valusek, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Berkhof, H.,Christ and the Powers, John Howard Yoder, trans. Scottsdale, Pa., Herald Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ricoeur, P.,The Symbolism of Evil, Emerson Buchanan, trans. Boston, Beacon Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Menninger, K.,Whatever Became of Sin? New York, Hawthorne Books, 1973, p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  29. .

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mowrer, O.,The Crisis in Psychiatry and Religion. Princeton, N.J., D. Van Nostrand Co., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Novak, M., “Families Are Still Basic,”The Lutheran, 1977,15, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yoder, J. H.,The Politics of Jesus. Grand Rapids, Mich., William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wakin, E., “Why Do People Beat Up Their Kids?”U. S. Catholic, 1974,39, 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  34. MacDonald, G., “How to Rebuke Your Child,”Moody Monthly, 1977,77, 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tournier, P.,The Violence Within, Edwin Hudson, trans. San Francisco, Harper and Row, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Garbarino, J., “The Elusive ‘Crime’ of Emotional Abuse,”Child Abuse and Neglect: The International J., 1978,2, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Burgess, R., and Conger, R., “Family Interaction Patterns in Abusive, Neglectful and Normal Families,”Child Development, 1978,49, 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Garbarino, J., “The Price of Privacy: An Analysis of the Social Dynamics of Child Abuse,”Child Welfare, 1977,56, 565–575.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McDonald, J., “The Children Need Help,”The Lutheran, 1977,15, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Brown, W., and Palmer, A., “A Preliminary Study of Schizophrenic Women Who Murdered Their Children,”Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1975,26, 71–75. Steele, B., and Pollack, C., “A Psychiatric Study of Parents Who Abuse Infants and Small Children.” In Helfer, R. E., and Kempe, C. H., eds.,The Battered Child, 2nd ed. Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1974.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Belgum, D.,Guilt: Where Religion and Psychiatry Meet. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1963; Reprint ed., Minneapolis, Augsburg, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Frank, J.,Persuasion and Healing: A Comparative Study of Psychotherapy. New York, Schocken Books, rev. ed., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lieber, L., and Baker, J., “Parents Anonymous and Self-Help Treatment for Child Abusing Parents: A Review and an Evaluation,”Child Abuse and Neglect: The International J., 1977,1, 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Currie, J. R. B., “A Psychiatric Assessment of the Battered Child Syndrome,”South African Medical J., 1970,44, 635–639.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yoder,.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Giarretto, H., “Humanistic Treatment of Father-Daughter Incest.” In Helfer, R. E., and Kempe, C. H., eds.,Child Abuse and Neglect: The Family and the Community. Cambridge, Mass., J. B. Lippincott Co., Ballinger Publishing Co., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Foster, A., “The Problem of Understanding Evil,”Religion in Life, 1969,38, 555–569.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yoder,.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Garbarino, J., and Gilliam, G.,Understanding Abusive Families. Lexington, Mass., Lexington Books, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garbarino, J., Hershberger, J.K. The perspective of evil in understanding and treating child abuse. J Relig Health 20, 208–217 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01561182

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01561182

Keywords

Navigation