Skip to main content
Log in

Intermediate variables in the explanation of differential fertility: Results of a village study in rural Java

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A tendency for fertility to be higher among middle-class women than among lower-class women has been found in all the recent sources of data on fertility levels and patterns in Indonesia. After briefly reviewing these findings, this article presents the results of a community study in rural Java which systematically investigates the positive relation between fertility and socioeconomic status, focusing on the so- called intermediate variables (first inventoried by Davis and Blake in 1956) which directly determine fertility. Differential patterns of marital stability, secondary sterility, and the practice of postpartum abstinence in particular were found to contribute to the contrasts in fertility levels observed. The use of modern contraceptives, a recent innovation at the time of the study, was found to a greater extent among middle-class women, and may prove to be an important determinant of future patterns of fertility and fertility differentials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biro Pusat Statistik. (1977).Keterangan fertilitas penduduk Indonesia (Fertility of the Indonesian Population). Seri tabulasi nomor 1, Survey Penduduk Antar Sensus 1976. Biro Pusat Statistik, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondan Supraptilah and Budi Suradji. (1979).Pengaruh perbedaan sosioekonomi terhadap fertilitas dan mortalitas masa kanak-kanak di Indonesia (the Influence of Socioeconomic Differences on Fertility and Child Mortality in Indonesia). Survey Fertilitas-Mortalitas Indonesia 1973, Monograph No. 6. Lembaga Demografi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics. (1978).Indonesia Fertility Survey 1976: Principal Report. Vol. I. Central Bureau of Statistics, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Lee-Jay, Suharto, S., McNicoll, G., and Made Mamas, S. D. (1976).Perkiraan angka kelahiran dan kematian di Indonesia berdasarkan Sensus Penduduk 1971 (Estimates of Fertility and Mortality in Indonesia based on the 1971 Population Census). Biro Pusat Statistik, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., and Blake, J. (1956). Social structure and fertility: An analysis framework.Economic Development and Cultural Change 4(3): 211–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, E. D. (1963).Differential Fertility in Central India. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, R., (1966).Housekeeping among Malay Peasants, 2nd Ed. The Athlone Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R. (1963) Norms for family size in underdeveloped areas.Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 159: 220–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, H. (1961).The Javanese Family: A Study of Kinship and Socialization. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gille, H. and Pardoko, H. (1966). A famliy life study in East Java: Preliminary findings. In Berelson, B.,et al. (eds.),Family Planning and Population Programs: A Review of World Developments, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harts-Broekhuis, A., and Palte-Gooszen, H. (1977).Demografische aspekten van armoede in zeen javaans dorp, Jambidan, D. I. Y. (Demographic Aspects of Poverty in a Javanese Village, Jambidan, D. I. Y.). Geographical Institute, University of Utrecht, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haryono Suyono, Pandi, S. H., Astawa, I. B., Moeljono, and Reese, T. H. (1976).Village Family Planning: The Indonesian Model. Technical Report Series Monograph No. 13. National Family Planning Coordinating Board, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, T. H., Hull, V. J., and Singarimbun, M. (1977). Indonesia's family planning story: Success and challenge.Population Bulletin 32, No. 6. Population Reference Bureau, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, V. (1975). Fertility, socioeconomic status, and the position of women in a Javanese village. PhD thesis, Department of Demography, The Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, V. (1976).The Positive Relation Between Economic Class and Family Size in Java: A Case Study of the Intermediate Variables Determining Fertility. Monograph Series No. 2, Population Institute, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPPA (Indonesian Planned Parenthood Association). (1968).Draft Report of the KAP Survey, Jakarta, Indonesia. IPPA, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Slamet and Amin Yitno. (1979).Hasil tabulasi sensus, survey ekonomi, dan fertilitas proyek Ngaglik (Tabulations of the Census, Economic Survey, and Fertility Survey from the Ngaglik Project). Report Series No. 20. Pusat Penelitian dan Studi Kependudukan (Population Studies Center), Yogyakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., and Martin, C. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., and Gebhard, P. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D. (1966). Factors affecting Moslem natality. In Berelson, B.,et al. (eds.),Family Planning and Population Programs: A Review of World Developments, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nag, M. (1968).Factors Affecting Human Fertility in Nonindustrial Societies: A Cross-Cultural Study. (Reprint of Yale University Publications in Anthropology No. 66, 1962). HRAF Press, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, R. G., Wyon, J., Parker, M., and Gordon, J. (1965). A case study of birth interval dynamics.Population Studies 19(1): 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. (1960).And the Poor Get Children: Sex, Contraception, and Family Planning in the Working Class. Quadrangle Books, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singarimbun, M., and Manning, C. (1974). Fertility and Family Planning in Mojolama. Monograph Series No. 1. Population Institute, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soebandi. (1976).Pengaruh faktor-faktor sosial ekonomi terhadap family size di Kabupaten Malang, Jawa Timur (The Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on Family Size in Kabupaten Malang, East Java). Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suharto, S. (Project coordinator) (1975).The Effect of Household Socioeconomic Status on Fertility and Child Mortality Levels. Central Bureau of Statistics, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien, H. Y. (1968). The intermediate variables, social structure, and fertility change: A critique.Demography 5(1): 138–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaukey, D. (1969). On theorizing about fertility.American Sociologist 4(2): 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on a study of fertility patterns undertaken in Yogyakarta during 1972–1973. The research was funded by the Australian National University. A complete account of the research findings is contained in Hull (1975), and a detailed analysis of the topics discussed here can be found in Hull (1976).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hull, V.J. Intermediate variables in the explanation of differential fertility: Results of a village study in rural Java. Hum Ecol 8, 213–243 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01561025

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01561025

Key words

Navigation