The borda and condorcet principles: Three medieval applications

Abstract

We report three medieval works, hitherto unknown to social choice, which discuss procedures for elections when there are more than two candidates. Two of the three propose Borda methods and the third a Condorcet method of successive pairwise comparison. All three discuss problems of manipulation. One of them displays a matrix for pairwise comparisons; this is a work written in 1299, nearly 600 years before the matrix notation was believed to have been invented by C. L. Dodgson. We conclude with a review of the theory of voting in medieval Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Alcover AM (ed) (1914) Obres originals del iluminat Doctor Mestre Ramon Lull, vol 9. Comissio Editora Lulliana, Palma

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Black D (1958) The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bonner A (ed and transl) (1985) Selected works of Ramon Lull, 2 vols. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Borda J-C de (1784) Memoire sur les élections an scrutin. Histoire et Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences année 1781, pp 657−65

  5. 5.

    Cusanus N (Nikolaus von Cues) (c. 1434) De concordantia catholica. In: Kallen G (ed) (1964) Nicolai de Cusa Opera Omnia, vol XIV. Felix Meiner, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    de Grazia A (1953) Mathematical derivation of an election system. Isis 44:42–51

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dodgson, CL (1876) A method of taking votes on more than two issues. In [2] pp 224−34

  8. 8.

    Dummett M (1984) Voting procedures. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Galbraith GR (1925) The constitution of the Dominican order 1216–1360. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Honecker M (1937a) Lullus-Handschriften aus dem Besitz des Kardinals Nikolaus von Cues: nebst einer Beschreibung der Lullus-Texte in Trier und einem Anhang über den wiedergefundenen Traktat ‘De Arte Electionis’. In: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kulturgeschichte Spaniens, Reihe I, Band 6, Finke H (Hrsg), pp 252–309. Verlag der Aschendorffschen Verlagsbuchhandlung, Münster in Westfalen

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Honecker M (1937b) Ramon Lulls Wahlvorschlag Grundlage des Kaiserwahlplanes bei Nikolaus von Cues? Historisches Jahrbuch 57:563–74

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lull R (c. 1274) The book of the gentile and the three wise men. In [3], vol I, pp 110–304

  13. 13.

    Lull R (c. 1285) Blanquerna. Catalan text in [1]; out-of-date English translation in [18]

  14. 14.

    Lull R (c. 1288) The book of wonders. In [3], vol II, pp 659–1105

  15. 15.

    Lull R (1299) De Arte Eleccionis. Cod. Cus. 83 Fol. 47V-48R. In [10], pp 308−9

  16. 16.

    Lull R (1311) Vita coaetana. In [3] vol I, pp 13–48

  17. 17.

    Murray A (1978) Reason and society. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Peers EA (ed and transl) (c. 1926) Blanquerna: a 13th century romance translated from the Catalan of Raymond Lull. Jarrolds, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Radice B (ed and transl) (1969) The letters of the younger Pliny. Penguin, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rasch BE (1987) Manipulation and strategic voting in the Norwegian parliament. Public Choice 52:57–73

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Riker WH (1986) The art of political manipulation. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ruffini Avondo E (1927) I sistemi di deliberazione collettiva nel medioevo italiano. Bocca, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sigmund PE (1963) Nicholas of Cusa and medieval political thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We acknowledge with gratitude the support of the Leverhulme Trust for IMcL's work on the history of social choice; William Riker for an initial lead on Nicolas Cusanus; Alexander Murray for translating Cusanus and reviewing IMcL's translation of Lull's Latin text; and Robert Pring-Mill for reviewing JL's translation of Lull's Catalan text.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLean, I. The borda and condorcet principles: Three medieval applications. Soc Choice Welfare 7, 99–108 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560577

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pairwise Comparison
  • Economic Theory
  • Social Choice
  • Matrix Notation
  • Condorcet Method