Sex Roles

, Volume 32, Issue 11–12, pp 735–751 | Cite as

College students' perceptions of mothers: Effects of maternal employment-childrearing pattern and motive for employment

  • Judith S. Bridges
  • Claire Etaugh
Article

Abstract

This study examined primarily middle-class Caucasian college students' (n = 460) perceptions of mothers as a function of their employment-child-rearing pattern (continuous employment following 6 weeks of maternity leave, interrupted employment until the child was in first grade, or discontinued employment after the child's birth) and employment motive (fulfillment, financial, or unstated). Results showed that continuously employed compared to other mothers were perceived as less communal and were less positively evaluated. Further, continuously employed mothers were seen as less communal if their employment was for fulfillment rather than financial necessity. Inferences about the mother's perceived commitment to the maternal role help explain some of the communality findings, and perceived maternal role commitment and communality explain the evaluation findings. Discussion focuses on college students' views of normative roles and characteristics for women.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baber, K. M. & Monaghan, P. (1988). College women's career and motherhood expectations: New options, old dilemmas.Sex Roles, 19, 189–203.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridges, J. S. (1987). College females' perceptions, of adult roles and occupational fields for women.Sex Roles, 16, 591–604.Google Scholar
  4. Bridges, J. S. (1989). Sex differences in occupational values.Sex Roles, 20, 205–211.Google Scholar
  5. Bridges, J. S., & Etaugh, C. (1994). Black and White college women's perceptions of early maternal employment.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 427–431.Google Scholar
  6. Bridges, J. S., & Orza, A. M. (1992). The effects of employment role and motive for employment on the perceptions of mothers.Sex Roles, 27, 331–343.Google Scholar
  7. Bridges, J. S., & Orza, A. M. (1993). Effects of maternal employment-childrearing pattern on college students' perceptions of a mother and her child.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 103–117.Google Scholar
  8. Eagly, A. H. (1987).Differences in social behavior: A social role analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.Google Scholar
  10. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes, occupational roles, and beliefs about part-time employees,Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 252–262.Google Scholar
  11. Etaugh, C., & Folger, D. (1990, June).Perceptions of parents: Effects of gender, employment status and spouse's employment status. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  12. Etaugh, C., & Nekolny, K., (1990). Effect of employment status and marital status on perceptions of mothers.Sex Roles, 23, 273–280.Google Scholar
  13. Etaugh, C., & Study, G. G. (1989). Perceptions of mothers: Effects of employment status, marital status, and age of child.Sex Roles, 20, 59–70.Google Scholar
  14. Fiorentine, R. (1988). Increasing similarity in the values and life plans of male and female college students? Evidence and implications.Sex Roles, 18, 143–158.Google Scholar
  15. Heider, F. (1958).The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffnung, M. (1989). Motherhood: Contemporary conflict for women. In J. Freeman (Ed.),Women: A feminist perspective (4th ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981).Estimating the effects of social interventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Machung, A. (1989). Talking career, thinking jobs: Gender differences in career and family expectations of Berkeley seniors.Feminist Studies, 15, 35–58.Google Scholar
  20. O'Connell, L., Betz, M., & Kurth, S. (1989). Plans for balancing work and family life: Do women pursuing nontraditional and traditional occupations differ?Sex Roles, 20, 35–45.Google Scholar
  21. Russell, J. E. A., & Rush, M. C. (1987). The effects of sex and marital/parental status on performance evaluations and attributions.Sex Roles, 17, 221–236.Google Scholar
  22. Russo, N. F. (1979). Overview: Roles, fertility and the motherhood mandate.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 7–15.Google Scholar
  23. Schroeder, K. A., Blood, L. L., & Maluso, D. (1992). An intergenerational analysis of expectations for women's career and family roles.Sex Roles, 26, 273–291.Google Scholar
  24. Spade, J. Z., & Reese, C. A. (1991). We've come a long way maybe: College students' plans for work and family.Sex Roles, 24, 309–321.Google Scholar
  25. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978).Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, & antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  26. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1993).Statistical abstract of the United States: 1992, 113th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wong, P. T. P., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650–663.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith S. Bridges
    • 1
  • Claire Etaugh
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Connecticut at HartfordWest HartfordUSA
  2. 2.Bradley UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations