Skip to main content
Log in

Moral metaphysics, moral revolutions, and environmental ethics

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many philosophers and environmentalists have advocated the development of a revolutionary new moral paradigm that treats natural objects as “morally considerable” in-themselves, independently of their relation to human beings. Often it is claimed that we need to develop a radically new theory of value to underpin this new paradigm. In this paper, I argue against this position and in favor of a more critical approach to environmental ethics. Such a critical approach, I believe, is not only more politically sound, but it is not open to the kinds of objections that afflict “biocentric moral theories” that depend on a conception of the intrinsic worth of nature. In the first sections of the paper, I develop a set of these criticism. In the last part of the paper, I turn to examine the advantages of a critical approach to environmental ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Additional information

Roger Paden is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies at George Mason University. He is the author of over forty scholarly articles and reviews in the fields of ethics, policy studies, and social and political philosophy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paden, R. Moral metaphysics, moral revolutions, and environmental ethics. Agric Hum Values 7, 70–79 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01557312

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01557312

Keywords

Navigation