Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theories de l'heterosis et relations karyo—cytoplasmiques

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The problem of heterosis has been scrutinized from two points of view: the general experimental methodology and the interpretation of the facts in existing theories.

Concerning the general experimental methodology, the relativity of the concept of heterosis is shown with respect to age and time of development of the parental strains, to the variations of the environmental conditions and to the direction of the reciprocal crosses. Therefore, in a large number of cases, experiments have taught not to be exhaustive.

Concerning the existing theories, heterosis is considered to be the result of a heterozygosity which can express itself at three levels, which are defined as heteroallely, heterogenomy and heterocytomy. Some works, which are well-representative for one of these three levels, are analysed, and within the results and theories of these works is looked for a point of agreement, in order to render a general hypothesis of heterosis possible. This point of agreement appears to be the cytoplasm, or more precisely, a nucleo-cytoplasmic equilibrium. In this way alone it is possible to disclose the existing continuity from crosses, as well as in the expression of the ovula-spermatozoid compatibility, which varies from lethality to hybrid vigour. From these evidences a general theory of heterosis is presented, by which heterosis is explained as the result of a disturbed nucleocytoplasmic equilibrium: it considers heterosis as a particular case of a more general law,i.e. the ovula-spermatozoid compatibility.

This hypothesis is also discussed with respect to the diverse existing theories of cytoplasmic heredity. Some unsolved questions bearing on these problems are put forward, and the way to their solution has been indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliographie

  • Bateson, W. (1913). Mendel's principles of heredity. 3rd impression with additions. (First ed., 1902). — Cambridge, Camb. Univ. Press, 413 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuttel, E. (1940). Bastardierungsversuche in der GattungStreptocarpus Lindl. 2. Die Heterosis beiStreptocarpus Hybriden. — Z. Bot. XXXV, p. 49–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brncic, D. (1954). Heterosis and the integration of the genotype in geographic populations ofDr. pseudoobscura. — Genetics XXXIX, p. 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, A. B. (1910). The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science XXXII, p. 627–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzzati-Traverso, A. A. (1952). Heterosis in population genetics. — In: J. W. Gowen, ed., Heterosis, p. 149–160. — Ames, Iowa, Iowa St. Coll. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspari, E. (1948). Cytoplasmic inheritance. — Advanc. Genet. II, p. 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, W. E. (1946). Genes which divide species or produce hybrid vigor. — Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash. XXXII, p. 145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. M. &J. M. Smith (1955). The genetics ofDr. subobscura: I. Hybrid vigour and longevity. — J. Genet. LIII, p. 173–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correns, C. (1937). Nicht mendelnde Vererbung. — In: E. Baur & M. Hartmann, Hrsg., Handbuch der Vererbungswissenschaft, II. Lief. 22, 159 p.

  • Crow, J. F. (1952). Dominance and overdominance. — In: J. W. Gowen, ed., Heterosis, p. 282–297. — Ames, Iowa, Iowa St. Coll. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. &K. Mather (1952). The elements of genetics. 3rd ed. — London, G. Allen & Unwin, 446 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1876). Des effets de la fécondation croisée et de la fécondation directe dans le règne végétal. (Trad. de E. Heckel) — Paris, C. Reinwald, 496 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1948). Genetics of natural populations: 16. — Genetics XXXIII, p. 158–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1950). Genetics of natural populations: 19. — Genetics XXXV, p. 288–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1952). Nature and origin of heterosis. — In: J. W. Gowen, ed., Heterosis, p. 218–223. — Ames, Iowa, Iowa St. Coll. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. &O. Pavlovsky (1960). How stable is balanced polymorphism? — Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash. XLVI, p. 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. &B. Wallace (1953). The genetics of homeostasis inDrosophila. — Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash. XXXIX, p. 162–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, E. M. &H. K. Hayes (1912). Heterozygosis in evolution and in plant breeding. — Bull. U.S. Bur. Pl. Ind. CCXLIII, p. 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ephrussi, B. (1953). Nucleo-cytoplasmic relations in micro-organisms: their bearing on cell heredity and differentiation. — Oxford, Clarendon Press, vii+127 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. -Trans. roy Soc. Edinb. LII, p. 399–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. — Oxford, Clarendon Press, 272 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1931). The evolution of dominance. — Biol. Rev. VI, p. 345–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtauer, K. (1940). Untersuchungen über die Beziehungen zwischen Photoperiode, Lichtintensität, sowie Temperatur und der Plasmavererbung beiEpilobium. — Jb. wiss. Bot. LXXXIX, p. 412–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R. B. (1955). Theoretical genetics. — Berkeley & Los Angeles, Univ. Calif. Press, x+563 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowen, J. W. (1952). Heterosis: a record of researches directed towards explaining and utilizing the vigor of hybrids. — Ames, Iowa, Iowa St. Coll. Press, 552 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuts, M. J. (1956). Temperature adaptation inGasterosteus aculeatus L. — Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli XXVIII, p. 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1960). Discussion sur les bases du néo-darwinisme. — Arch. Philos. XXIII, p. 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, M. J. &J. M. Smith (1955). The effects of inbreeding on rate of development and on fertility inDr. subobscura. — J. Genet. LIII, p. 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, F. H. (1946). Regression analysis of corn yield data. — Genetics XXXI, p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1952). Recurrent selection and overdominance. — In: J. W. Gowen, ed., Heterosis, p. 451–473. — Ames, Iowa, Iowa St. Coll. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. F. (1917). Dominance of linked factors as a mean of accounting for heterosis. — Genetics II, p. 466–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1945). Heterosis resulting from degenerative changes. — Genetics XXX, p. 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1952). Plasmagenes and chromogenes in heterosis. — In: J. W. Gowen, ed., Heterosis, p. 224–235. — Ames, Iowa, Iowa St. Coll Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1960). The genotype as the sum of plasmatype and chromotype. — Amer. Nat. XCIV, p. 181–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, F. &C. Pellew (1910). The mode of inheritance of stature and of time of flowering in peas (Pisum sativum). — J. Genet. I, p. 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L. (1948). Dictionary of genetics. — Waltham, Mass., Publ. Chron. Bot., ix+183 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, T. A. (1799). An account of some experiments on the fecundation of vegetables. — Phil. Trans. LXXXIX, p. 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolreuter, J. G. (1766). Dritte Fortsetzung der vorläufigen Nachricht von einigen das Geschlecht der Pflanzen betreffenden Versuchen und Beobachtungen. Gleditschen Handlung. 1766. Réimprimé en 1893 in Ostwald's Klassiker der exakten Wissenschaften Nr. 41.

  • Lerner, M. (1954). Genetic homeostasis. — Edinburgh, Oliver & Boyd, vii+134 P.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1958). The genetic basis of selection. — New York, J. Wiley, xvi+298 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1952). Cytoplasmic heterosis of winter fruiting in tomatoes. — Rep. Innes hort. Instn 1952, p. 12–13.

  • Lints, F. A. (1960). Nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions inDr. melanogaster. — Genetica XXXI, p. 188–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1961). Diversity by inbreeding. — Genetica XXXII, p. 177–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, A. (1936). Growth difference in reciprocal hybrids and cytoplasmic influence on growth in mice. — J. exp. Zool. LXXII, p. 497–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, P. (1935). Erhöhte Wachstumintensität und Pilzresistenz durch Plasmavererbung, sowie über die Bedeutung des Plasmas bei Kreuzungsschwierigkeiten. — Züchter VII, p. 74–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1939) — Keimstimmung und Plasmavererbung beiEpilobium. — Jb. wiss. Bot. LXXXVIII, p. 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1942). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die geographische Verbreitung von Plasmon-Unterschieden und der auf diese Unterschiede empfindlichen Gene, sowie deren theoretische Bedeutung für das Kern-Plasma-Problem. — Biol. Zbl. LXII, p. 170–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1943). Untersuchungen an reciprok verschiedenen Artbastarden beiEpilobium. I. Über die Bastarde verschiedener Sippen der ArtenE. hirsutum mitE. parviflorum, resp.E. montanum. — Flora XXXVII, p. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1951). Über die allgemeine Verbreitung plasmatischer Erbträger und ihre Bedeutung für die Entwicklungsphysiologie. — Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. XLIV, p. 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1951). Plasmavererbung und Heterosis. — Z. Pflanzenz. XXX, p. 250–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1954). Cytoplasmic inheritance inEpilobium and its theoretical significance. — Advanc. Genet. VI, p. 287–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1958). The genetical interactions between nucleus and cytoplasm inEpilobium. — Exp. Cell Res. Suppl. VI, p. 236–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (1960a). Genetical interactions between nucleus and cytoplasmic cell-constituents. — Int. Congr. Cell Biol. Paris (1960).

  • - (1960b). Communication personnelle.

  • Michaelis, P. &R. W. Kaplan (1950). Manifestationswechsel beim Zusammenwirken chromosomaler und plasmatischer Erbfaktoren. — Naturwissenschaften XXXVII, p. 494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H. (1915a). The constitution of the hereditary material. — Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. LIV, p. 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1915b). Localization of the hereditary material in the germ cells. — Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. I, p. 420–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1926). Genetics and the physiology of development. — Amer. Nat. LX, p. 489–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehlkers, F. (1938). Bastardierungsversuche in der GattungStreptocarpus Lindl. 1. Plasmatische Vererbung und die Geschlechtsbestimmung von Zwitterpflanzen. — Z. Bot. XXXII, p. 305–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1940). Genetisch-physiologische Untersuchungen zum Vitalitätsproblem. — Z. Bot. XXXV, p. 271–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, O. &W. Kupper (1921). Artkreuzungen in der GattungEpilobium. — Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. XXXIX, p. 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanitz, F. (1932). Experimentelle Analyse der Genom- und Plasmonwirkung bei Moosen. 5. — Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre LXII, p. 232–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, A. F. (1912). The influence of inbreeding on vigor inHydatina senta. — Biol. Bull. XXIV, p. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull, G. H. (1914). Duplicate genes for capsule form inBursa-bursa-pastoris. — Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. VererbLehre XII, p. 97–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1948). What is “heterosis?” — Genetics XXXIII, p. 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaas, J. &M. J. Heuts (1958). Contributions to the comparative physiology and genetics of the European Salmonidae. 2. Physiologie et génétique du développement embryonnaire. — Hydrobiologia XII, p. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, C. (1948). Negative heterosis and decreased effectiveness of alleles in heterozygotes. — Genetics XXXIII, p. 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetukhiv, M. (1953). Viability of hybrids between local populations ofDr. pseudoobscura. — Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash. XXXIX, p. 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1954). Heterosis and hybrid breakdown in hybrids between local populations of certain species ofDrosophila. — Caryologia VI, Suppl. part. II, p. 760–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1954b). Integration of the genotype in local populations of three species ofDrosophila. — Evolution VIII, p. 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1956). Fecundity of hybrids between geographical populations ofDr. pseudoobscura. — Evolution X, p. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C. H. (1953). Epigenetics and evolution. — Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. VII, p. 186–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. (1955). Interpopulation hybrids inDr. melanogaster. — Evolution IX, p. 302–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, W. G. (1944). Heterosis. — Bot. Rev. X, p. 461–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weight, S. &T. Dobzhansky (1946). Genetics of natural populations: 12. — Genetics XXXI, p. 125–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Génétique Générale. Centre National de Radiobiologie et de Génétique, Institut Agronomique de l'Université, Héverlé-Louvain

    F. A. Lints (Chargé de Recherches au F.N.R.S.)

Authors
  1. F. A. Lints
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lints, F.A. Theories de l'heterosis et relations karyo—cytoplasmiques. Acta Biotheor 16, 1–26 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01556768

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01556768

Search

Navigation