Skip to main content
Log in

Commentary

  • Published:
Group

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (1988). The contribution of mother-infant mutual influence to the origins of self-and-object representations.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 5, 305–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, M. G. (1995). What does borderline mean?Psychoanalytic Psychology, 12, 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard, G. O., & Wilkinson, S. M. (1994).Management of countertransference with borderline patients. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, L. (1976). Group psychotherapy of the borderline patient. Paper presented at the International Conference on Borderline Disorders, Topeka, Kansas.

  • Kernberg, O. (1976).Object relations and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibel, H. D. (1980). Discussion: The importance of a comprehensive clinical diagnosis for group psychotherapy of borderline and narcissistic patients.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 30, 427–440.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. InEnvy and gratitude and other works, 1946–1963 (pp. 1–24). New York: Delacorte, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosseff, J. W. (1975). The leader using object relations theory. In Z. Liff (Ed.),The leader in the group. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosseff, J. W. (1990). Anchoring the self through group: Congruences, play and the potential for change. In B. E. Roth, W. N. Stone, & H. D. Kibel (Eds.)The difficult patient in group. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosseff, J. W. (1991). Infant and mother and the mother group. In S. Tuttman (Ed.),Psychoanalytic group theory and therapy. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meares, R. (1993).The metaphor of play. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, W. W. (1984). Clinical differentiation of borderline syndromes from the psychoses.Psychoanalytic Review, 71, 185–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. H. (1986).The matrix of the mind: Object relations and the psychoanalytic dialogue. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, B. E. (1979). Problems of early maintenance and entry into group psychotherapy with persons suffering from borderline and narcissistic states.Group, 3, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, L. (1977). The regulation of change in the infant-caretaker system and some aspects of the context-content relationship. In M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.),Interaction, conversation and the development of language. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavinska-Holy, N. (1982). A schematic approach in psychoanalytic treatment of borderline and narcissistic patients in homogeneous groups. Mimeographed paper. New York: Postgraduate Center for Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, M. (1974). Discussion of Ms. Clifton's paper.International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 3, 293–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, F. (1993) Implications of object relations theories for the psychoanalytic process.Annual of Psychoanalysis, 21, 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosseff, J.W. Commentary. Group 19, 249–254 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552922

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552922

Keywords

Navigation