Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of sand cover on the survival and vigor ofRosa rugosa Thunb.

  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rugosa rose,Rosa rugosa Thunb., is adapted to the northeast coast of the United States. It can be used to trap blowing sand or planted for beautification. Unpredictable weather conditions during the year of establishment have caused survival to be generally poor. Field observations have indicated that rugosa rose spruted from old plants when covered with 30 to 60 cm of sand. To test this observation, rugosa rose was planted at three depths: 0, 15 and 30 cm deeper than the normal planting depth. Roses planted 30 cm deeper than normal developed expanded leaves sooner than did those planted at the normal depth. Peat moss mixed in the planting hole tended to delay leaf formation for the 0 cm treatment but had no effect on survival at any depth. Survival during the first year was 100% for the 30 cm depth and 93% for 0- and 15-cm treatments. The deeper planted roses were more vigorous at the end of the season than were those set at the normal depth. Rose hips developed on plants set at the two deeper treatments. No hips were produced on those plants for the normal depth. New roots grew on the buried stems. These new roots were near the sand surface rather than uniformly distributed along the buried stems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • GRAETZ, K. E. (1973): Seacoast Plants of the Carolinas. US Dept. Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Raleigh, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAGSCHITZ, J. A. and R. S. BELL. 1966. Restoration and Retention of Coastal Dunes with Fences and Vegetation. Bul. 382 B.I. Agri. Exp. Sta. Kingston, R.I.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHARP, W. C. (1969): Annual Technical Report on Field Eval. Plantings conducted in the mid-Atlantic area during 1960 to 1969. US Dept. Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Cape May Court.

  • THORNTON, R. B. and DAVIS, G. (1964): Development and Use of American Beachgrass for Dune Stabilization. US Dept. Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. National Plant Materials Center, US Dept. Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Beltsville, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOODHOUSE, W. W. and R. E. HANES. 1966. Dune Stabilization with Vegetation on the Outer Banks of N.C. Soils Inform. Ser. No. 8, N.C. Staten, Raleigh, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZAK, J. M. (1965): Sand Dune Erosion Control at Provincetown, Mass. J. Soil Water Cons., 40:188–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZAK, M. (1967): Controlling Drifting Sand Dunes on Cape Cod. Research Paper 7, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belcher, C.R. Effect of sand cover on the survival and vigor ofRosa rugosa Thunb.. Int J Biometeorol 21, 276–280 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552881

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552881

Keywords

Navigation